Absolutely.
Meanwhile they ARE benefitting from whiny RWR gammons. £277 MILLION in their coffers last count.
PHEW! Keep up the good work boyos.
RNLI
- Thread starter noseall
- Start date
Meanwhile they ARE benefitting from whiny RWR gammons. £277 MILLION in their coffers last count.
PHEW! Keep up the good work boyos.
One wonders if those RW lot who attack the RNLI would accept a 'taxi ride' from them should they find themselves in peril on the sea?
Yes because that's what they're supposed to be there for - to rescue people who didn't INTENTIONALLY endanger themselves. Not to help the government In their quest to flood UK with illegal third world males.
Last edited:
Intentionally?
I don’t know anyone that intentionally puts their life in danger, in that respect. Sounds to me like you gammons are talking your usual lackwit rubbish.
Their intentions are no different than any others that endanger themselves at sea. You could argue that their desperation makes them less international than say MBK pugwash and his nonchalant trip into rough weather or a holidaymaker ignoring warning signs, or some pizzed up boat trippers ignoring sea currents and diving in anyway.
Nope, you RWR have got it erse about face again.
Last edited:
Or you can tell us whether you think that the RNLI should let people drown when they could be saved...
No point holding my breath whilst waiting for you to actually answer a very simple question
Why do the rnli need to save them, are the boats un seaworthy.Or you can tell us whether you think that the RNLI should let people drown when they could be saved...
No point holding my breath whilst waiting for you to actually answer a very simple question
- Joined
- 11 Dec 2012
- Messages
- 5,856
- Reaction score
- 3,203
- Country
Waw HM, you paint your nails orange I see!!
Same reason they save any vessel that gets into difficulty at sea. Overloading is probably as more to blame than seaworthiness.
Are you an expert on whether a boat is seaworthy or not?
But if deemed unseaworthy, would you let the occupants drown rather than let the RNLI make the decision to save human lives?
"Rescue at sea is anchored in maritime tradition as a human duty and is recognised as customary international law"
Would you withdraw from that law as well as get rid of the HRA?
- Joined
- 22 Aug 2006
- Messages
- 7,474
- Reaction score
- 1,328
- Country
Yes the immigrant boatists are endangering their own lives, France is safe, etc.
They now have an expectation that "someone" will look after them. Would I care if the odd boatload of 100 drowned?
Not tangibly, no. No more than some airliner somewhere,
Put Navy boats obstructing them them while they're at the half-way, and call out the French Lifeboats.
They now have an expectation that "someone" will look after them. Would I care if the odd boatload of 100 drowned?
Not tangibly, no. No more than some airliner somewhere,
Put Navy boats obstructing them them while they're at the half-way, and call out the French Lifeboats.
- Joined
- 7 Nov 2023
- Messages
- 21,293
- Reaction score
- 13,793
- Country
Most of those will have already ordered their Deliveroo boxes and made arrangements to purchase a moped, desperate my arris!!!
Well will somebody please tell the french that then.
They should be rescuing them as soon as the boat gets into 6 foot of water off the French coast.
So the french mustn't think the boat is overloaded then and don't think they need saving.
Are you a little bit backward?
