Without an isolator, there is very little an electrician could do. I did look at the smart meter which switches the supply, but for me, it would not really help as too much rewiring involved, it is a problem reminding my wife when things can be set off, the move from 00:00–05:00 to 00:30–05:30 when we changed suppliers, does seem to catch her out, in summer no problem there is normally battery left anyway, but most the heavy users washing machine, dishwasher etc, use high power when first turned on, over running at end of off-peak unlikely to cause a problem, except for dishwashers which dry the dishes.
But when already wired to have dedicated off-peak circuits, better to continue that way, so no error as to when items start to run.
What I do question is the huge difference in off-peak tariffs, why should someone charging a car with off-peak pay very much less as to someone heating storage radiators? We are looking at as low as 5p/kWh OP for some EV tariffs, but economy 7 more like 20p/kWh, OP it seems robbing from the poor to give to the rich. Many poor people have storage heaters, only the rich can afford EV cars.
Yes, the peak also shifts, but looking at rate designed for solar panels Octopus Flux and compare with rate offed for non-tied EV users Octopus Go, and the Flux rates do not seem to make sense.

the non-tied Go rates are 8.5p/kWh and 30.17p/kWh and export is 15p/kWh as long as the export rate is the same or more than off-peak, one can fully charge batteries overnight, but if export is less than off-peak, then one needs to be careful not to run out of room in the battery to store solar.
First 18 months of solar, I was not paid for export, and the second battery resulted in me loosing money with an off-peak supply, and I was better off with a fixed 24-hour rate.
So now, looking at Economy 7, does it save the user money? And what will be the result if they went to a 24-hour fixed rate? For the user, only heating rooms as required, can dramatically reduce energy used. I found this with oil fired central heating when I fitted 10 programmable TRV heads, so rooms only heated as and when required. So in spite of not getting off-peak, the bills could drop.
However, drawing power during the day when doing other things like having a shower or cooking, could mean using more than the supply is designed for, but I would think unlikely.
But for the supplier, having a dramatic reduction in off-peak use, and an increase in peak use, seems likely to cause them problems, but once people realise they are not paying more having got rid of off-peak, they are not likely to return, had I not started being paid for export, I would have stopped using an off-peak tariff.
The other option is, to swap tariffs summer and winter, and only have off-peak in the winter. Having 1 in every 100 customers swap summer and winter is one thing, but having 50% swapping is another, and likely we would see more leaving charges for changing tariffs. I was rather surprised, I expected when my EV tariff with BG time ended where I needed to pay to exit it, that it would carry on but without exit charge, but no, it reverted to standard single rate tariff, which as it transpired saved me money. Had I not changed to Octopus, I would have not got an off-peak tariff again, it was only when I started being paid for export, that the off-peak made sense again.
So suppliers could very well shoot themselves in the foot if they do not get a smooth transition from teleswitches to smart meters, which is likely going to be good for solar panel owners, as I can see the duck curve in supply getting worse and worse as more solar panels without batteries are fitted, and the export rates offered are likely to fall, but an extra load during peak times as people stop using Economy 7 will likely extend the point where suppliers say thank you, but no, thank you to solar export. I just hope my panels pay for themselves before that happens.