• Looking for a smarter way to manage your heating this winter? We’ve been testing the new Aqara Radiator Thermostat W600 to see how quiet, accurate and easy it is to use around the home. Click here read our review.

Shows how untrustworthy the BBC are

Status
Not open for further replies.
asylum seekers / economic migrants reduce GDP per capita, so we are all poorer, even you Notchie. Removing/stopping them would therefore make the country wealthier and safer for everyone.
who would it make wealthier?

are you saying that if the government was not paying out that cost, they would distribute those savings to everybody in the country

the answer is NO they wouldnt, we would be no better off at all



safer for everybody: really? how much do asylum seekers increase the risk to each person by?

I would say this country would be safer without Tommy Robinson and Nigel Farage stirring up sh1t and causing riots
 
Immigrants spend more time caring for and saving the lives of ungrateful chavvy Brits, than ending them.
 
who would it make wealthier?

are you saying that if the government was not paying out that cost, they would distribute those savings to everybody in the country

the answer is NO they wouldnt, we would be no better off at all



safer for everybody: really? how much do asylum seekers increase the risk to each person by?

I would say this country would be safer without Tommy Robinson and Nigel Farage stirring up sh1t and causing riots
Inward migration is without doubt lowering our GDP per Capita, so we will be all marginally poorer. Less public services, so less NHS, Less Police, less infrastructure. This sort of wealth is not instantly tangible like finding 50p under the pillow (or whatever the tooth fairy leaves these days ?)
So 'safer' not on the grounds that these migrants commit all the crime (i think they commit more than their fair share), but the country will be wealthier and the wealthier a community the less crime they commit. The poorer we get the worse crime will become

We certainly need inward migration, but we need to choose who comes on the grounds of what they can add.
 
If all the asylum seekers were deported tomorrow…..what actual difference would it make to your life.

Examples please, not more deflection
I would be less likely to be stabbed - or the females in my family rapped.
Before you go mental; if there were 1m here and only 1 of them stabbed someone, then if they are not here then I would have less chance of being stabbed.
 
He never stops asking the same question and getting the same answers from anyone who can be bothered. Noseall, Securespark, Galahad, John D, and the Himmies are the same. Go back any number of years and you will see this behaviour repeated over and over. What do they get out of it?
If you keep replying to him - in his head he thinks that means you are his friend even if he has to insult you to get a responce - that responce makes him think you are his friend. I think its all part of a chronic narcissism disorder -- look it it up, its an exact fit for him

Here -- look see what I mean
Spline has not been affected at all by asylum crisis
Johnny has not been affected at all by asylum crisis
Filly has not been affected at all by asylum crisis
Mottie has not been affected at all by asylum crisis
Motorbiking has not been affected at all by asylum crisis
Andy Devon has not been affected at all by asylum crisis
Nobody, not a single person has come up with a single valid example
 
I would be less likely to be stabbed - or the females in my family rapped.
Before you go mental; if there were 1m here and only 1 of them stabbed someone, then if they are not here then I would have less chance of being stabbed.
If only it was that simple.

Remove all immigrants and there's no chance of stabbings and rape !

Typical divisive stuff.

And no I'm not supporting mass immigration. I want, and have always wanted more, better and quicker processing and returns.

But let's not fool ourselves. Removing all immigrants won't cure our crime.
 
Nobody, not a single person has come up with a single valid example of how asylum seekers have actually affected them personally
Everyone spent about 4 pages pointing it out to you with examples - you are exhausting - I dont have time for you today
 
Nobody, not a single person has come up with a single valid example of how asylum seekers have actually affected them personally
If you are a net contributor to this country from a tax point of view, you are affected.
- extra policing
- cost of housing
- legal aid and tribunal costs
- immigration legal costs
- spend on France deterrents
- border force costs
- RNLI being stretched
- illegal working and gang funding
- access to NHS
- local authorities having to house

shall we go on?

Every single net contributor is paying the bill.
 

Good old BBB....
He's a content creator mixing law and politics, chasing subscribers, and doubtless makes a good living from it. But he's not claiming to be a final arbiter on the law. It's strange that in his introduction he goes on about tran s people: what has that got to do with the Trumpf edit?
 
If you are a net contributor to this country from a tax point of view, you are affected.
- extra policing
- cost of housing
- legal aid and tribunal costs
- immigration legal costs
- spend on France deterrents
- border force costs
- RNLI being stretched
- illegal working and gang funding
- access to NHS
- local authorities having to house

shall we go on?

Every single net contributor is paying the bill.
If they settle here, which many do, they contribute through general taxation, it's not a zero sum game. Successive governments make it more expensive for the taxpayer, not less, by spaffing money on Rawanda and not letting them work
 
If they settle here, which many do, they contribute through general taxation, it's not a zero sum game. Successive governments make it more expensive for the taxpayer, not less, by spaffing money on Rawanda and not letting them work
Working and paying some taxes does not mean you are a net contributor. Unless you pay in more than you take out, you are still a drain on those who pick up the bill. Of course a person can bring value in other ways, but lets not kid ourselves, if they were Engineers, Doctors etc. they'd probably be able to get a visa.
 
He's a content creator mixing law and politics, chasing subscribers, and doubtless makes a good living from it. But he's not claiming to be a final arbiter on the law. It's strange that in his introduction he goes on about tran s people: what has that got to do with the Trumpf edit?
I think he's making a point that they are not impartial and have lost their way. Seems many agree.

Regarding the lawsuit. From what I've read, its pretty tough to bring a claim in the US and the bar is lower in the UK.
He stands a better chance of suing in the UK, by claiming malicious falsehood, he has a chance to argue that the court should allow the proceedings and waive the time limit. Max awards would be about 1/3rd a million.

 
He's a content creator mixing law and politics, chasing subscribers, and doubtless makes a good living from it. But he's not claiming to be a final arbiter on the law. It's strange that in his introduction he goes on about tran s people: what has that got to do with the Trumpf edit?
Just goes to show how woke, left you are!!
 
That is exactly what I NEVER said
Ok.

So what are you trying to say or imply ?

Doesn't matter who you want in power, all our immigrants will never leave, for various reasons.

As much as I want much more control over our borders, the immigrants are not the actual problem. That's our lack of infrastructure and services. Who do you blame for that ?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top