- Joined
- 7 Nov 2023
- Messages
- 13,542
- Reaction score
- 7,818
- Country

Know that for a fact do you, you speak on their behalf a lot.And in their eyes his reputation will not have been damaged.

Know that for a fact do you, you speak on their behalf a lot.And in their eyes his reputation will not have been damaged.

I would love to see the back of the BBC, they harbour lot's of unsavory characters whilst paying them ridiculous amounts of money all funded by our TV licence fees.
A democratic society cannot function without a broadly accepted body of facts. The US no longer has that: there are red-state facts and blue-state facts; Fox News facts and MSNBC facts. The Watergate scandal that drove Richard Nixon from office would barely make a dent in today’s US: the right would simply deny the evidence, cheered on by its media allies.
What stands between Britain and that sorry state, in which knowledge is a matter of tribal affiliation, is the BBC.

but it is true so it is not simply my opinionWhat you wrote after the comma was just you seeking to rationalise your view. The first 10 words are all that matter to you.

I WAS AT my son's house earlier this evening and the fool had some BBC crap on. It was something about problems on a new build housing estate somewhere in England. Reporter goes into one of the houses to interview the resident... who was a white woman in a burka.

Know that for a fact do you, you speak on their behalf a lot.
I hope he makes a point to the BBC, there will have been some suckered into this false reporting and fake news that will indeed have damaged his reputation.
People will have made up their own mind on him, those that hadn't were swayed into believing that he had incited violence

ProbablyKnow that for a fact do you?
Know that for a fact do you?
The last four pages of 'discussion' show the real reason this site is being run down: S.fix trolls.I'm quite disappointed with the Mods on this occasion, Knave was around for ages and Morq still remains.
It's driving down the traffic levels because people won't engage with them.
That's not the only reason this site has achieved significant reputational damage.
Well yes. He became president of the USA. Didn't you know? As far as the US public and Trump were concerned, the edit was harmless.Know that for a fact do you,
We call them head scarves in the UK.a white woman in a burka.

Its because people are sick of the lefty woke trolls on here...The last four pages of 'discussion' show the real reason this site is being run down: S.fix trolls.
And it's getting worse, especially since Bill-y and Ben joined. Trolling from the RWR has hit new heights.The last four pages of 'discussion' show the real reason this site is being run down: S.fix trolls.

I know, you must hate it. New people, different views to yours, sense of humour, it's terrible really. How very dare we.And it's getting worse, especially since Bill-y and Ben joined. Trolling from the RWR has hit new heights.

Yes 100%. They just don't see the fact that it is a very small group on here that don't like it. You would think they would simply move on elsewhere.Its because people are sick of the lefty woke trolls on here...

Diddums.The last four pages of 'discussion' show the real reason this site is being run down: S.fix trolls.