Shows how untrustworthy the BBC are

Status
Not open for further replies.
Oh, so you are going on about nothing ?
This thread is about the reputational damage the Panorama edit has done to the BBC. This is lasting damage, they got it wrong, they admit to getting it wrong and they apologised for getting it wrong. Some on here hate Trump so much that they cannot believe they were misled by the BBC. The fact is they were and the BBC have admitted it.
 
Last edited:
You won't get an answer -
No wonder S.fix got shut of 'em.
Well if you wasn’t quite so welcoming and friendly then perhaps nobody would cross over onto here. They seem to be arriving by the boat load because of it.
 
This thread is about the repetitional damage the Panorama edit has done to the BBC. This is lasting damage, they got it wrong, they admit to getting it wrong and they apologised for getting it wrong. Some on here hate Trump so much that they cannot believe they were misled by the BBC. The fact is they were and the BBC have admitted it.
I’ve not seen the Panarame edit, only Trumps original speech inciting the riot.
Do you seriously believe that a clumsy UK based edit somehow changes the fact Trump incited the Jan 7th riots?
Granted, it may have made some UK folk despise him even more. Mislead? Nope.
 
I’ve not seen the Panarame edit, only Trumps original speech inciting the riot.
Do you seriously believe that a clumsy UK based edit somehow changes the fact Trump incited the Jan 7th riots?
Granted, it may have made some UK folk despise him even more. Mislead? Nope.
Mbk trying to split hairs again
 
I’ve not seen the Panarame edit, only Trumps original speech inciting the riot.
Do you seriously believe that a clumsy UK based edit somehow changes the fact Trump incited the Jan 7th riots?
Granted, it may have made some UK folk despise him even more. Mislead? Nope.
You've not seen it, but have formed an opinion? :LOL:

Do you think the Beeb were wrong to apologise? Do you think the resignations for overseeing a massive f*up were a mistake?

Mbk trying to split hairs again
You understand that its not me that makes you and nosenout look stupid?
Perhaps he somehow believes the Panorama edit exonerates Trump, lol.
No that would be the acquittal.
 
You've not seen it, but have formed an opinion? :LOL:

Do you think the Beeb were wrong to apologise? Do you think the resignations for overseeing a massive f*up were a mistake?


You understand that its not me that makes you and nosenout look stupid?

No that would be the acquittal.
Trump incited violence

Trump is guilty of insurrection



the Panorama programme is a tiny part of the BBCs output, yet right wing numpties are trying to claim it shows the BBC is an unreliable source
 
Trump incited violence

Trump is guilty of insurrection



the Panorama programme is a tiny part of the BBCs output, yet right wing numpties are trying to claim it shows the BBC is an unreliable source
So there was no need to apologise and resign?

Seems a bit daft to quit your job over a non-thing, don't you think? Would be even more stupid to apologise for something that didn't happen.

maybe its time they were sold off, with that level of incompetence.
 
Trump so much that they cannot believe they were misled by the BBC. The fact is they were and the BBC have admitted it.
you do talk utter nonsense

nobody has been misled by the BBC Panorama.

his Jan 6th speech has been widely proven to be inciting violence and an act of insurrection -a majority of congress voted that it was insurrection, USA judges and courts have stated that as have detailed studies


if Motorbiking thinks Trump was not incitnig violence then it is Motorbiking that is misled

get yer nose out of the Telegraph for a day
 
So there was no need to apologise and resign?
we already know the resigning was the result of a witch hunt

Seems a bit daft to quit your job over a non-thing, don't you think?
strawman

Would be even more stupid to apologise for something that didn't happen.
it was not an unconditional apology

it only apologised for the editing, but refuted any claim for defamation as there was no defamation
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top