Sorry, but this is important.

[JohnD]

Late one night, when the corridors of the hospital were largely deserted, a small, middle-aged female nurse went to the women's changing room after suffering an unexpectedly heavy period, wishing to clean herself up and change her clothes in privacy. and found herself alone in there with him. She objected to his presence and they had an altercation. Towering over her, and standing between her and the door, he refused to leave, insisted that he was a woman and ordered her to agree with him.

When she didn't back down, he made an official complaint that she had bullied and disrespected him and was prejudiced against men calling themselves women.

A woman who was cleared of all allegations.

The man Upton is not a woman. He was not "cleared" of these facts. They are not "allegations."

 

[King Billy]

It is very important to the TransActivists to avoid admitting that a person who is not a woman is not entitled to access spaces and events that are reserved exclusively for women.

If it can't be decided who is a woman by listing the characteristics that makes a woman a woman, how can the requirement for only women to be admitted, be enacted?
We can decide a space is for bleperques only. But unless someone can decide what characteristics are needed for someone to be recognised as a bleperque, it's a nonsensical decision.
It's like having an age limit, but no identification exists to verify someone's age. It creates more problems than it solves.

So they are anxious to throw in as many diversions as they can, such as "this man looks quite pretty in this artfully prepared photograph, so surely he should be allowed into a women's changing room in the middle of the night" and "there aren't many of them and quite a lot of them aren't violent criminals or sex offenders, so they should all be allowed in." We also get "some people have genetic abnormalities and physical deformities therefore all men should be allowed in." We've even had "a nomadic bronze age tribe in North Africa thousands of years ago didn't recognise variations and this is the reason people are prejudiced against them."

Any examples of these diversions?
Or is it the J K Rowling verision again?

Now we're getting "plumbers and builders are not skilled at biological definitions therefore there is no difference between a man and a woman" and "a person I don't like supports women's rights therefore I deny the facts."

So what are the characteristics that define a woman as a woman?
And what are these women's rights that are more important than trans-women's rights, and why are some people's rights more important than other's rights?

These attempts are all nonsense.

Because they refute your arguments, they're nonsense

The simple truth is that women are entitled to single-sex spaces, and people who are not women are not entitled to access them.

It's legislation that determines that, not some mythical or religious truth.
And you still refuse to provide a list of characteristics that makes a woman a woman. Without that your arguments are like howling at the moon.

The Trans Activist go to great lengths to avoid that truth.

Because it's legislation not truth, and not fact. It's based on religious or prejudicial beliefs about reproductive ability, and little else.
Science disagrees with that religious or prejudicial belief.