The British empire

Joined
7 Jan 2007
Messages
8,836
Reaction score
1,230
Country
United Kingdom
So was it all bad colonialism ?????

It seems not ..... https://www.hoover.org/research/bright-side-british-colonialism

From the article ~


"What does all of this mean for economic growth today? There are persistent differences in economic growth across the countries of the world, but many of the most successful ones are former members of the British Empire. This is no coincidence. At the time that England was establishing its empire across the globe, it was the most successful economy in the world and the greatest military power. The institutions underlying economic growth—secure property rights, rule of law, contract enforcement, active markets—were in place in Britain. The colonies offered a laboratory for further improvements, especially in terms of the demarcation of land rights."


And the conclusion ?

Several conclusions can be drawn from this historical experience. One is that there are advantages to having been a British colony because of the beneficial institutions that could be transplanted from England. Second, the transplanting of institutions requires some centralized control, but at the same time, flexibility to local conditions. Third, to this day, the effects of those institutions persist. Once in place, they have long-lasting implications for the countries’ patterns and levels of economic growth. Fortunately for the inhabitants of most of the former British Empire, even those in tropical countries, institutions that promoted growth were adopted, in some cases over 200 years ago, and their advantages remain.
 
Sponsored Links
Does that apply to all the former parts of the empire? No?

Does the same apply to the other European countries' empires? Yes?


So, some countries that were part of the British Empire are doing well and so are some that weren't and vice versa.


Not completely true is it?

upload_2020-3-8_18-58-43.png


Never mind. It sounds good to the chauvinists.
 
Does that apply to all the former parts of the empire? No?

Does the same apply to the other European countries' empires? Yes?


So, some countries that were part of the British Empire are doing well and so are some that weren't and vice versa.


Not completely true is it?

View attachment 185557

Never mind. It sounds good to the chauvinists.

I think your rather missing the point as usual .......we're talking specifically about the British Empire, an empire virtually unmatched.
We're not talking about little European countries. The point made is that it has benefited former colonies to the extent they still utilise it's systems ....your point is what exactly .....piffle ?
 
Sponsored Links
The Empire?

Im not sure Gasbanni is very forward thinking.
 
Back
Top