The irony

By promptly breaking the NI Protocol?
That's not a start, it's a backward step.
He hasn't broken the N. I. Protocol.
The Protocol itself is broken.
It is causing the very problems it was designed to prevent.
 
He hasn't broken the N. I. Protocol.
The Protocol itself is broken.
It is causing the very problems it was designed to prevent.
He hasn't broken it yet, because the bit he intends to ignore don't come into effect until 1/4/21
He's certainly given notice of his intention to break it by unilaterally ignoring the bits he wants to ignore.
 
Gee you brexers are easily fooled

Jeff Taylor is ex UKIP and has a youtube channel banging the drum for clueless gammons

Frost has never done fuk all and never will


No it's ignorant fckrs like you who are easily fooled.
You swallow the establishment line so completely that you refuse to even look at anything that runs contrary to your beliefs.
And all you ever do is to attack the messenger, while dismissing the message.

He's ex UKIP and he has a youtube channel....So fcking what? Is what he is saying making any sense, that is the question, you may not agree with him or anyone else, but it is a sure sign of a brain dead, brain washed moron to just dismiss everything out of hand the way that you do.
 
Hard line brexiteer ( frost) argues that the UK should not be run by unelected bureaucrats

said bloke is made member of the lords and appointed to the cabinet office as brexit minister

:)


That made me laugh too when I see it.
 
He hasn't broken it yet, because the bit he intends to ignore don't come into effect until 1/4/21
He's certainly given notice of his intention to break it by unilaterally ignoring the bits he wants to ignore.
The government has the right to take measures to protect the UK internal market.
If the EU regulations are causing hardship and disrupting the flow of trade, then any measures taken to alleviate those problems are legal.

Anyway the EU is beginning to have second thoughts about their "border"

 
The government has the right to take measures to protect the UK internal market.
If the EU regulations are causing hardship and disrupting the flow of trade, then any measures taken to alleviate those problems are legal.

Anyway the EU is beginning to have second thoughts about their "border"

Brexiteers blaming EU for the pile of poo that is Brexit again.
Brexiteers wanted Brexit, now they have it, but want something different.
They're behaving like a spoilt child like that, cry for what they want, then when they get it, they cry for something different.
 
and the prize for hypocrite of the week goes to...


....you refuse to even look at anything that runs contrary to your beliefs.....it is a sure sign of a brain dead, brain washed moron to just dismiss everything out of hand the way that you do.
 
Brexiteers blaming EU for the pile of poo that is Brexit again.
Brexiteers wanted Brexit, now they have it, but want something different.
They're behaving like a spoilt child like that, cry for what they want, then when they get it, they cry for something different.
It isn't only Brexiteers who are crying, a lot of remain voters are crying as well.
A majority in N. I. voted remain, i guess a majority of them now bitterly regret that decision.
Your attitude is typical of Europhiles, you don't give a fuk who gets damaged as long you have a stick to beat Brexiteers with.
 
It isn't only Brexiteers who are crying, a lot of remain voters are crying as well.
A majority in N. I. voted remain, i guess a majority of them now bitterly regret that decision.
Counterintuitive.


Your attitude is typical of Europhiles, you don't give a fuk who gets damaged as long you have a stick to beat Brexiteers with.
Your comment exactly reflects the Brexiteers' sentiments: "don't give a fuk who gets damaged as long they have regained sovereignty." Whatever that is. :rolleyes:
 
If the British don't enforce the N. I. Protocol to the EUs satisfaction, then the EU may have to erect their border somewhere else.
If its not on the sovereign border between the UK and the RoI, then where will it be?.
 
If the British don't enforce the N. I. Protocol to the EUs satisfaction, then the EU may have to erect their border somewhere else.
If its not on the sovereign border between the UK and the RoI, then where will it be?.
If UK don't intend to honour the agreement, why agree to it in the first place.
But you're right, if UK break the agreement, and insist the border cannot be in the Irish sea, the border has to go somewhere. Where do you suggest?
UK created the problem with Brexit and refuse the obvious solution.
 
If UK don't intend to honour the agreement, why agree to it in the first place.
But you're right, if UK break the agreement, and insist the border cannot be in the Irish sea, the border has to go somewhere. Where do you suggest?
UK created the problem with Brexit and refuse the obvious solution.
The UK is honouring the agreement as far as i know.
Under the rules anything that damages the flow of trade and community stability then the UK can take unilateral action.
 
The UK is honouring the agreement as far as i know.
Under the rules anything that damages the flow of trade and community stability then the UK can take unilateral action.
We'd best wait for the legal eagles judgement, eh?
Can you show us these rules that you have been told apply?
 
Back
Top