They Want Any Excuse For Censorship

Freedom of speech is ok when it's of a particular persuasion...

Seems to me that musk is a depraved pervert...

Does AI stand for 'Arse Injected'?
 
90
 
They have been desperate to shut down musks x since he brought it, going after it for this shows that again when there are loads of other platforms allowing it to be done.
The lefties loved musk and his EV cars right up until he joined trumps team and all of a sudden started attacking peoples tesla’s in the street
 
An X user recently asked Grok to identify misinformation super-spreaders on the site from the UK, and probably the youngest among them were Tommy Robinson, 43, and Darren Grimes, 32.. This was data crunched from Amnesty, Global Witness and the BBC, among others, and helpfully built a list of accounts most likely to promulgate untruth or conspiracy, with the caveat it was “subjective and depends on sources”: Nigel Farage, Laurence Fox, Julia Hartley-Brewer, George Galloway, Katie Hopkins, David Icke.

Spineless must be disappointed to not make the list.
 
Free speech Starmer wants to ban people talking about him...

The slimy man who presents this video and takes ages to say almost nothing, is the same man from the video you posted last week. Who is he. Is he important.

1768297176901.png
 
Social media is full of people with altered images, the proposed law would be impossible to frame and enforce effectively. AI should be sufficient to identify mis use of apps that produce inappropriate images. We could take a leaf out of Denmark's laws which give every citizen a "copyright" over their voice and body. That might upset the tabloids, but with proper legal backing, allows individuals to sue direct.
 
Free speech Starmer wants to ban people talking about him...

No, the government wants to prevent access to a tool that is creating child p0rn, among other illegal and unethical uses of Grok. America and many other countries are pushing to do the same. If you think allowing deep fake child p0rn images is free speech, you need urgent re-educating on the subject.
 
The diversion is that this is being done to protect children.

The biggest threat to children in this country is Starmer himself.
 
"AI undressing people in photos isn't free speech - it's abuse," says campaigner Ed Newton Rex.

"When every photo a woman posts of themselves on X immediately attracts public replies in which they've been stripped down to a bikini, something has gone very, very wrong."
 
The diversion is that this is being done to protect children.

The biggest threat to children in this country is Starmer himself.
Absolute rubbish

Do you agree with uncontrolled abuse of women and children as being free speech?

Sinking to some very low levels I think.

If these pictures were on advertising posters they wouldn't be allowed. Why is it allowed elsewhere?

Be careful what you stand for !
 
Back
Top