Trump is suing the BBC for Ten Billion USD.

[motorbiking]

Trump wanted his riot - he gave the riot speech - the speech-goers rioted.

The BBC got it spot on. No case to answer. They condensed a rambling riot speech is all. Sensible editing.

why did they apologise?

 

[noseall]

why did they apologise?

Trump wanted it. Simpler for the BBC to offer it than not. He also demanded recompense or else he would sue. Guess what, they told him to shove it.

 

[motorbiking]

Trump wanted it. Simpler for the BBC to offer it than not. He also demanded recompense or else he would sue. Guess what, they told him to shove it.

So they partially, did what he wanted in the hope it would be enough, when they actually felt they had done nothing wrong.

I think any sane person would see they held their hands up to having given "the mistaken impression that President Trump had made a direct call for violent action".

 

[noseall]

So they partially, did what he wanted in the hope it would be enough, when they actually felt they had done nothing wrong.

Depends what you mean by 'wrong'?

 

[transam]

Fact Is some bloke had to resign from the BBC

BBC had to apologise

 

[Highway Man]

Depends what you mean by 'wrong'?

You don't know the difference. Only sensible people can see through this and you could hardly be accused of being that.

 

[motorbiking]

Depends what you mean by 'wrong'?

did they or did they not:

Splice together two entirely separate parts of President Trump’s speech on January 6, 2021? Yes or No

Did they depict President Trump telling supporters: “We’re going to walk down to the Capitol and I’ll be there with you. And we fight. We fight like hell and if you don’t fight like hell, you’re not going to have a country anymore.”? yes or no

Is it true that he never uttered this sequence of words? yes or no

did they omit President Trump stating, less than one minute after urging supporters to cheer for their senators and congressmen, “I know that everyone here will soon be marching over to the Capitol building to peacefully and patriotically make your voices heard” yes or no

I've highlighted the correct answer for you.

That seems to be the gist of what the claimant suggests the beeb did wrong.

 

[carmanmemoranda]

maybe stick to changing oil filters

Don't worry. Your rowboat doesn't need it changing

You are baking a fool of yourself in yet another thread

The beeb must be quaking in their boots if they believe the stuff you're spouting

 

[Highway Man]

Don't worry. Your rowboat doesn't need it changing

You are baking a fool of yourself in yet another thread

The beeb must be quaking in their boots if they believe the stuff you're spouting

baking?

 

[noseall]

That seems to be the gist of what the claimant suggests the beeb did wrong.

What do you mean, 'wrong'? Upsetting Tump is something people do daily, if they are not fawning over the fat orange rapist. I don't know what you mean by wrong? The BBC did what all news outlets do i.e. edited a news article. It was misleading - yes. Wrong? I think not.

Hence the BBC telling the fat orange rapist to shove any monetary compensation where the sun will never shine. Good for them too.

 

[fillyboy]

did they or did they not:

Splice together two entirely separate parts of President Trump’s speech on January 6, 2021? Yes or No

Did they depict President Trump telling supporters: “We’re going to walk down to the Capitol and I’ll be there with you. And we fight. We fight like hell and if you don’t fight like hell, you’re not going to have a country anymore.”? yes or no

Is it true that he never uttered this sequence of words? yes or no

did they omit President Trump stating, less than one minute after urging supporters to cheer for their senators and congressmen, “I know that everyone here will soon be marching over to the Capitol building to peacefully and patriotically make your voices heard” yes or no

I've highlighted the correct answer for you.

That seems to be the gist of what the claimant suggests the beeb did wrong.

Which has never been in question. The BBC admit it and apologised. The defamation case centres around whether or not malice' was involved.

 

[noseall]

Fact Is some bloke had to resign from the BBC

BBC had to apologise

Standard diplomatic fare, when it comes to the fragile orange rapist.

 

[Highway Man]

Standard diplomatic fare, when it comes to the fragile orange rapist.

He isn't a rapist either...

 

[motorbiking]

Which has never been in question. The BBC admit it and apologised. The defamation case centres around whether or not malice' was involved.

indeed - but the forum numpties think the beeb apologised out of politeness.

 

[noseall]

The defamation case

...is more fragile than Trumps' ego. And that says a lot.