I can't see them agreeing to that.That might not be far enough if the counter offensive pushes Russian troops away from Bakhmut.
It was a telling picture of President Xi standing shoulder to shoulder alongside Putin this week, and China's peace proposal should be examined more closely.
Ukraine may have to make a compromise in order to end this war; allow Russia's annexation of Luhansk and Donbas to be internationally ratified, then apply for a fast tracked membership of NATO in order to block any future aggression from their neighbour.
The alternative is a long, drawn out war, more destruction and death, with China supplying assistance should Russia ask for it, just as America, the UK and the EU have done for Ukraine.
Of course they will not agree to that - as this analysis @theCarnegie concludes...I can't see them agreeing to that.
Crimea is possibly the only loss that they could accept. Russia will keep coming back for a bit more, if it isn't stopped. If the losses are close to accurate, Russia is running out of weapons and troops fast.
Russia will rapidly bee trying to target the new tanks before they can be put to good use as an attempt to discourage the west from supplying more high end weapons.
£6 million a day, or around £35 per person per year.How much do you think the British taxpayer is paying to subsidise the military and economic aid to Ukraine every day?
The same amount spent on maintaining migrants in hotels around the UK every day.£6 million a day, or around £35 per person per year.
You say that, but how many Andy11s are there who are at best xenophobic and hate the idea of any foreigners living here, or at worst racists who'd rather machine gun them indiscriminately.Its not the victims of war that people object to housing, its the economic migrants and organised criminal recruits along with feeding a billion£ trafficking industry.
How, much does the, UK spend on filling in Potholes.£6 million a day, or around £35 per person per year.
Google it yourself.How, much does the, UK spend on filling in Potholes.
The business of business is business.Its not the victims of war that people object to housing, its the economic migrants and organised criminal recruits along with feeding a billion£ trafficking industry.
Its not the victims of war that people object to housing, its the economic migrants and organised criminal recruits along with feeding a billion£ trafficking industry.
I clearly and deliberately did the exact opposite.You deliberately and dishonestly frame them all as economic migrants so you can object to them all.
evidence shows most are genuine
Its not the victims of war that people object to housing [GROUP A], its the economic migrants and organised criminal recruits [GROUP B] along with feeding a billion£ trafficking industry [GROUP C].
Group A - welcome refugees
So if we're willing to subsidise Ukraine's war for that, then it seems appropriate we should be spending a similar amount on the victims of these wars.