UNjustified
- Thread starter Odds
- Start date
Sponsored Links
Immedfiately refuted by the Hamas and other Palestinian representatives attending the same discussions.
Immedfiately refuted by the Hamas and other Palestinian representatives attending the same discussions.
The 'other Palestinian representative' being 'Palestinian Islamic Jihad'
PIJ formed as an offshoot of the Muslim Brotherhood and was influenced ideologically in its formation by the Islamic regime in Iran. It is a member of the Alliance of Palestinian Forces, which rejects the Oslo Accords and whose objective is the establishment of a sovereign Islamic Palestinian state.[7] It calls for the military destruction of Israel and rejects a two-state solution.[8] The organization's financial backing has historically come mainly from Syria and Hezbollah.[9][10] Since 2014, PIJ has seen its power steadily increase with the backing of funds from Iran.[11]
Bigger fruitcakes than Hamas. You have some very strange allegiances Jim.
Sponsored Links
The PIJ are very much the minority group in Palestine.
It looks like a political process has failed since about 1947, so it's no wonder they've resorted to a militry process.
And let's not forget that one man's terrorist is another's freedom fighter.
They want a Palestinian state within the 1948 borders.
If Israel hadn't sabotaged the Oslo agreement, Arafat, as Chairman of the PNA, he would have signed and he would have policed Palestine, including reigning in minority terrorist groups.
By sabotaging the agreement Israel made the situation much worse, they always do.
You're like Bod throwing accusations around like Christmas tinsel.
You have not the slightest evidence on which to base your accusation, so it's pure hateful abuse, nothing more, Katie.
Another FillyFact?
I know you like to insist 'the Jews were in Palestine first' and thought of that as i read an article about archaeology in the Holy Land. You may already know the Jewish State is very keen to establish scientific credibility to Biblical accounts and have found that...
The history of changes in the magnetic field is recorded in rock. Perhaps the most well-known record is etched in stone at the mid-Atlantic ridge.
Surprisingly, this method can also be used for archaeological sites like the one at Gath. If rocks at these sites become hot enough, they too can align to show the intensity and direction of the magnetic field. Such heat can be generated during military actions, when widespread destruction is common.
Using their chronological anchors, they could create a timeline. They recorded the intensity and direction shown in mud bricks from 21 archaeological layers at 17 sites to discover exactly when each of these cities was destroyed. The team showed that several cities were destroyed around the same time — Tel Rehov, Horvat Tevet, Tel Zayit, and Gath. They suggest that all of these cities were destroyed by Hazael.
the Big Think.com
It isn't really about who got there first, though; more a matter of establishing Bibical truth as historical fact and it's come as a bit of a shock to find all these events taken as legend are in fact, true. You can find all kinds of contradiction in the Good Book but when you read it as a history it's an important resource of context for complex matters of sovereignty.
The real problem is not the 'historical fact' as determined by modern science, it's aligning the 'historical fact' with Biblical stories.
We suffer even today at deciphering the reasons for political/geographical events and causes. We can only confirm that something happened, but not explain exactly what that something was, nor it's geopolitical repurcussions.
Modertn day historical fiction could pass as a genuine recollection of history, if we didn't know any better from genuine historical records.
You only have to watch Braveheart to see that for yourself.
Fake news?
Is it IDF policy to make the enemy take off their clothes before handing over their weapons?
Is it IDF policy to make the enemy take off their clothes before handing over their weapons?
Fair enough - it's a bit weird to make a fighter take off his trousers then his gun - don't they know that one is for fighting, the other's for fun?
"The Red Bull is on me!!!!!"
That's a still from a film, sillyboy.
The Hurt Locker (2008)
Suhail Dabbach in The Hurt Locker (2008)
Are you saying suicide vests aren't deployed in real life, or death?
It's further humiliation.
Urinating on Prisoners: Why Humiliation is Functional in Israel’s War on Palestinians
When Zionist militias, using advanced Western arms, conquered historic Palestine in 1947-48, they expressed their victory through the deliberate
www.counterpunch.org
Fact or fiction: Is Israel really rounding up ‘Hamas fighters’?
Or is it just humiliating Palestinian civilian men and boys and broadcasting it to the world to dehumanise them?
Last edited:
Sponsored Links
