I do expect you to have a modicum of intelligence to join the dots.
The UK played a fundamental role in the development of the single marketI suppose it works on the theory that when we voted to go into Europe it was sold as common market for trade, it went onto morph in to what it is today.
Just talk. One idea is to pass a law that says "illegal" immigrants can't claim asylum. That to take care of legal aspects. These are fringe talks at their conference. Rather different to an actual action.Truss has come up with a solution to stopping the 'migrants'. 36,000 so far thus year and thats what we know of. IF she resolves this id see her easily stay in term beyond next year.
Actually we voted to stay in after an experimental period of membership...I suppose it works on the theory that when we voted to go into Europe it was sold as common market for trade, it went onto morph in to what it is today.
Eu good Brexit bad.
Irrelevant. It assumes that the people organising it don't know about it.I thought they did give an explanation in how mission creep works.
Couldn't agree more in a globalist world don't get ideas above your station and so it came to pass and she has to bow down to big business and corporate pressure.She was a remainer. Her basic aim is to do things that make the entire country regret leaving the EU. Other countries aren't experiencing high gov loan rates or problems with their bond loan market or even as much devaluation of their currency. All politicians know they can't take on the various markets especially the money one and those that related to this aspect. There appears to be ~£60b hole in her plans. The pundits reckon the markets will want another U turn. The other type of pundits - a plot to get rid of her. No Tory party vote, replacement selected by MP's. Some one that all of them like. LOL Hope it's not Boris.
The concern in other areas is UK's problem spreading to other countries. Markets chaos in other words. There are signs of the gov blaming the BofE. Might satisfy some of us who live here. Unlikely to go down well with the experts. The BofE has the short end of the stick when things go wrong. Their actions wont please everybody who lives under their jurisdiction but this is how major economies are run.
Just when you seem to be in thinking mode you come out with this horseshit.Irrelevant. It assumes that the people organising it don't know about it.
The basic need for something or the other has been mentioned on the news. One aspect is noises from the USA about defence and numbers of boots provided for fighting. There is even been talk that european country's armies need to be bigger. The bottom line isn't just boots it's equipment too. NATO has areas that are standardised, in some ways weapons come down to who makes the best. Eurofighter is another aspect - collaboration in developing them. No one country involved can afford to do it alone. LOL Even Airbus is similar. There are other projects around and we wont be dropping out of all of them.
Oh I know buy from the USA instead. So a dick head video gets posted that doesn't consider these factors at all.
This might interest you - lowest number is best
Most powerful militaries in Europe 2023 | Statista
Russia had the most powerful military in Europe according to its PowerIndex score, which compares the strength and capability of different countries.www.statista.com