you need a bbc tv licence after midnight again

[noseall]

You either win or you lose so play the game to win.

Quite a lot do lose though. In fact most do.
Take-up is getting bigger each year too. Raking it in.

year No. of licences (million)
2014/15 25,507,726
2013/14 25,419,296
2012/13 25,338,330
2011/12 25,226,072
2010/11 25,103,079
2009/10 24,963,799
2008/09 24,871,994
2007/08 24,740,047
2006/07 24,545,516
2005/06 24,418,757
2004/05 24,161,532
2003/04 23,898,749
2002/03 23,485,613
2001/02 23,157,215

 

[big-all]

Quite a lot do lose though. In fact most do.
Take-up is getting bigger each year too. Raking it in.

year No. of licences (million)
2014/15 25,507,726
2013/14 25,419,296
2012/13 25,338,330
2011/12 25,226,072
2010/11 25,103,079
2009/10 24,963,799
2008/09 24,871,994
2007/08 24,740,047
2006/07 24,545,516
2005/06 24,418,757
2004/05 24,161,532
2003/04 23,898,749
2002/03 23,485,613
2001/02 23,157,215

stayed fairly constant at around 40% off the population 2001 40% off 59million is 23.6
2015 64.6million =25.84

 

[Gerrydelasel]

 

[noseall]

What do the numbers on the graph bars (top) represent?

 

[Gerrydelasel]

Average IQ of the show's presenter? Number of laughs per hour?

 

[noseall]

Average IQ of the show's presenter? Number of laughs per hour?

A nonsense pointless graph then.

 

[Gerrydelasel]

A nonsense pointless graph then.

It's just a joke graph. Lighten up.

 

[EFLImpudence]

I thought it was the number of paedophiles.

 

[HawkEye244]

Quite a lot do lose though. In fact most do.
Take-up is getting bigger each year too. Raking it in.

year No. of licences (million)
2014/15 25,507,726
2013/14 25,419,296
2012/13 25,338,330
2011/12 25,226,072
2010/11 25,103,079
2009/10 24,963,799
2008/09 24,871,994
2007/08 24,740,047
2006/07 24,545,516
2005/06 24,418,757
2004/05 24,161,532
2003/04 23,898,749
2002/03 23,485,613
2001/02 23,157,215

Truth in the minority of one does not make an untruth. I've encountered many lost causes like yourself but ultimately the fact I don't fund pedophilia and biased broadcast news is not on my conscience. You have a children/family yourself, I suppose your conscience does not extend beyond them. Do what you must to justify your actions, I care less.

 

[noseall]

Truth in the minority of one does not make an untruth. I've encountered many lost causes like yourself but ultimately the fact I don't fund pedophilia and biased broadcast news is not on my conscience. You have a children/family yourself, I suppose your conscience does not extend beyond them. Do what you must to justify your actions, I care less.

Does that mean you avoid all institutions that have been involved with employing paedophiles in some capacity?
Church?
Police?
Politics?
Pop Music?
Most television?
Education?
NHS?
Blah, blah, blah........?

 

[HawkEye244]

Does that mean you avoid all institutions that have been involved with employing paedophiles in some capacity?
Church?
Police?
Politics?
Pop Music?
Most television?
Education?
NHS?
Blah, blah, blah........?

Jesus christ ...and that makes it ok ?!?!?!

 

[JohnD]

So it's only the ones you have to pay for that you're concerned about?

Hmmm.
Almost as if what you dislike is not the paedophilia, but the paying your way.

 

[noseall]

Jesus christ ...and that makes it ok ?!?!?!

Are you saying I should opt out of the BBC because I wanna watch Paxo but a nonce was employed there once so I cant?
If you apply your theory to avoiding all those places where paedophiles have operated at some point then you are going to have to go live in a cave.
Do you live in a cave?
How does my license money fund paedophiles?

 

[HawkEye244]

Are you saying I should opt out of the BBC because I wanna watch Paxo but a nonce was employed there once so I cant?
If you apply your theory to avoiding all those places where paedophiles have operated at some point then you are going to have to go live in a cave.
Do you live in a cave?
How does my license money fund paedophiles?

You have a choice you simpleton. I'm not forcing anything on you. It's for everyone to judge independantly. If someone reading this decides they would not want to pay but didn't realise they have the choice, now they do. It's not for you to force your will on other people. You are coming to me with objection, I'm telling you I fundamentally disagree and for the reasons already mentioned. If you disagree with my freedom of choice or anyone elses freedom of choice you will lose. You can come out with any excuse you like, defending the lie that this is unlawful when it isn't. People have internet they can search, find out for themselves and make the decision right for them..

In honesty I can't really see what point you have in posting anymore.. you won't convince me to move one iota from my position, if you are hoping to convince others, remind yourself that the web can be used to research everything and anything and to find the truth.

 

[HawkEye244]

So it's only the ones you have to pay for that you're concerned about?

Hmmm.
Almost as if what you dislike is not the paedophilia, but the paying your way.

As already established nobody needs pay for a service they don't want or use.

We need health care, homes, roads and trains, we don't need a tv licence. If you want your beloved leftist BBC to stay alive keep paying them your money.

Go and join noseal in the sandbox.