- Joined
- 7 Jan 2010
- Messages
- 13,089
- Reaction score
- 3,022
- Country
you missed a letter out.I'm a cut
you missed a letter out.I'm a cut
you missed a letter out.I'm a cut
You think ? Well I never.Cute?
You do know that he spent all day on those don't you? Tsk tsk!I'm not going to bother reading them.
Maybe he doesn't like ladies who can stand up for themselves in a room full of lads...Awwwww, I fink Himmywimmy is a ickle bit upset.I wasn't aware that there were any ladies present.I see that Himaginn is a big hit with the ladies...
I know of an uncouth, foul-mouthed, biting, clawing female who is obsessed with stalking my every comment, in order to practice her foul-mouth expletives.
Please show me where it says that religious hate and tribalism is not racism. Here's the original quote for you to reference:No it isn't. That's what it says.Racism is one of the common forms of cultural discrimination. The quote makes it obvious that there are other forms not mentioned.Can't resist this one.Religious hate, tribalism and racism are the most common forms of cultural discrimination.
So, now - Racism is ONE form of cultural discrimination - therefore religious hate and tribalism are NOT racism.
It's only your interpretation that suggests that religious hate and tribalism is not racism.
It says that these types of prejudice are typical forms of cultural discrimination. It does not exclude religious hatred and tribalism from being cultural racism.Cultural discrimination refers to exclusion, restriction or hate that is directed at a person or a group on the basis of perceived or real differences in cultural values and beliefs. UNESCO indicates that discrimination can be direct or indirect and often leads to harassment or denial of basic rights. Religious hate, tribalism and racism are the most common forms of cultural discrimination.
_________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________
The first mention of "Cultural Discrimination" was yours, post number 50 timed at 6.48 PM yesterday:No, I didn't that was what the/your quote says.The discussion was about cultural racism. You introduced the concept of cultural discrimination in place of cultural racism.
It would seem the report contradicts itself.
My first use of it was the post immediately following yours, post number 51, timed at 6.59 PM yesterday.You are all forgetting that Himmy thinks(term used loosely) 'racist' means anything he has read anywhere that it means.
A report translated from a foreign language says that "we" now class cultural discrimination as racism.
With that logic, Himmy may be justified in calling you racist because you don't like someone with brown hair.
So, 1. your denial and claim is patently wrong, 2. your claim that the report contradicts itself is now a fallacious claim, and 3. your original assertion in your comment was obviously your twisted logic.
I don't think he does like anyone at all who stands up for themselves or points out his inconsistencies, double standards, boring posts, tit-for-tat nonsense, belittling and name-calling.Maybe he doesn't like ladies who can stand up for themselves in a room full of lads...Awwwww, I fink Himmywimmy is a ickle bit upset.I wasn't aware that there were any ladies present.I see that Himaginn is a big hit with the ladies...
I know of an uncouth, foul-mouthed, biting, clawing female who is obsessed with stalking my every comment, in order to practice her foul-mouth expletives.
Rather a silly analogy.Oh come on Himmy.
"Religious hate, tribalism and racism are the most common forms of cultural discrimination."
Digestives, Custard Creams and Ginger Nuts are the most common forms of Biscuits.
So, are Digestives and Custard Creams Ginger nuts?
Where does it say what?Where does it say that?
I think you're being silly now, but here goes, again:What is Cultural Racism?
Cultural racism is a term used in scientific research to describe a specific type of racism which developed from the generally known form of racism, which is "biological racism". "Cultural racism" is used by the UN, the swedish Equality Ombudsman and in the scientific world to describe some racist ideologies, ideas, reasoning, arguments, and notions.
I have already explained this to you. You introduced the concept of cultural discrimination in your post number 50. We were discussing cultural racism and you introduced cultural discrimination out of the blue. Perhaps by mistake or confusion, perhaps intentionally to try to confuse.So, where did the quote "Religious hate, tribalism and racism are the most common forms of cultural discrimination." come from?
So you obviously agree that cultural discrimination can exist, but you appear to argue that cultural racism cannot exist.Your comments are becoming more ridiculous with each successive post.
Cultural discrimination refers to exclusion, restriction or hate that is directed at a person or a group on the basis of perceived or real differences in cultural values and beliefs. UNESCO indicates that discrimination can be direct or indirect and often leads to harassment or denial of basic rights. Religious hate, tribalism and racism are the most common forms of cultural discrimination.
And you disagree with the word, want to change it or argue about what it means.
Note, it's a term used by UN, Swedish government and the scientific world. It's OK with me, but it's not OK with you.
Since when has having brown hair been of cultural significance?
You are really resorting to ludicrous arguments.
Did you get to the part when I asked you to explain precisely and explicitly what your argument was, but you were so confused you couldn't work out what your argument is or was?Himmy, I will admit I cannot keep up with your posts.
I am just here doing the equivalent of a discussion in the pub whereas you seem to have an indexed reference to everything that has come before.
You post something which I think is not quite right and necessitates looking back over now 89 posts and involves clearing up what is a misinterpretation on your part before being able to answer the point.
I note one of your very long posts, no. 83, was posted ONE minute after the previous post and posts 79 to 83 are TWO minutes apart.
I'm not going to bother reading them.
If you want to consider that a win on your part, that's fine.
Don't hold your breath!One of these days he may realise that the more sheite he writes the less people will be inclined to read it..