That's funny, in a previous link they stated it was not necessary because it was already within the Councils' power to regulate such things.
perhaps you've seen Panorama "Britain's Shame"
A council which knew a tower block where six people died was a fire risk but did not address the dangers will not face manslaughter charges.
A three-week-old baby was among the victims of the blaze at Lakanal House in Camberwell in July 2009.
It later emerged Southwark Council knew the building posed a fire risk but did not act and had not carried out a fire risk assessment.
A London council has pleaded guilty to four counts of breaking fire safety regulations over a blaze in a 14-storey tower block that killed six people.
Southwark council admitted it failed to address fire risks at Lakanal House in Camberwell, south-east London, in the years leading up to the UK’s worst ever tower block fire on 3 July 2009.
~~~~~~~~~
Outside court, the Labour MP Harriet Harman, whose constituency includes the estate where Lakanal House is situated, welcomed Southwark’s guilty pleas.
and your conclusion is that the government should have acted on the recommendations coming out of the Lakenal fire,
I will say that the first time a dangerous fire is identified,
and your conclusion is that the government should have taken advantage of the warning, and acted on the recommendations coming out of the Lakenal fire, rather than ignoring them, right?