High Rise Fire

Status
Not open for further replies.
That's funny, in a previous link they stated it was not necessary because it was already within the Councils' power to regulate such things.
 
Sponsored Links
No surprise

"Four separate government ministers were warned that fire regulations were not keeping people safe, in letters that have subsequently been seen by the BBC.

In the leaked letters, experts warn that those living in tower blocks like Grenfell Tower were "at risk".

At least 79 people are dead or missing presumed dead after the fire at the London high-rise last week.

The department that received the letters said work to improve regulation and safety had already been under way.

Leaked letters
The letters show experts have been worried about fire safety in tower blocks for years.

Following a fatal fire in Lakanal House in south London in 2009, a series of recommendations were made to keep people safe.

They were ignored. The government promised a review of fire regulations in 2013, but it still has not happened.

BBC One's Panorama has obtained a dozen letters sent by the All-Party Parliamentary Fire Safety and Rescue Group.

Informed by experts, it warned the government it "could not afford to wait for another tragedy".

Four ministers - all from the Department for Communities and Local Government - received letters but did not strengthen the regulations."

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-40330789
 
I precied it. But what you and C4 were doing, was trying to show that the Tories had blocked the bill completely, whilst they'd been very naughty in delaying the ideas, and putting them under their own banner.
 
Sponsored Links
Lakanal House.

Southwark Council was a Labour run council

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-london-18280160

A council which knew a tower block where six people died was a fire risk but did not address the dangers will not face manslaughter charges.
A three-week-old baby was among the victims of the blaze at Lakanal House in Camberwell in July 2009.
It later emerged Southwark Council knew the building posed a fire risk but did not act and had not carried out a fire risk assessment.

https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news...fety-failings-tower-block-lakanal-house-blaze
A London council has pleaded guilty to four counts of breaking fire safety regulations over a blaze in a 14-storey tower block that killed six people.
Southwark council admitted it failed to address fire risks at Lakanal House in Camberwell, south-east London, in the years leading up to the UK’s worst ever tower block fire on 3 July 2009.
~~~~~~~~~
Outside court, the Labour MP Harriet Harman, whose constituency includes the estate where Lakanal House is situated, welcomed Southwark’s guilty pleas.
 
and your conclusion is that the government should have taken advantage of the warning, and acted on the recommendations coming out of the Lakenal fire, rather than ignoring them, right?
 
If Chancellor Hammond says "today is Friday" what day is it?
 
and your conclusion is that the government should have acted on the recommendations coming out of the Lakenal fire,

No The fact is that the Labour Government allowed the Labour Council to ignore the need to act to remove the dangers at Lakanal House that the Labour Council had identified.

You are saying the present Government is at fault for allowing the Grenfell incident, will you say the Governent in 2009 was equally at fault for allowing the Lakanal incident to happen ?
 
I will say that the first time a dangerous fire is identified, and a report and recommendations emerge, action should be taken to prevent a recurrence.

I think seven years, and four housing ministers, are probably sufficient.

Don't you?

Is it Friday?
 
"my understanding is that it is Friday" says Chancellor Hammond.

Is it Friday?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Sponsored Links
Back
Top