child seperation

[Bodd]

You think my reply is funny?

But then I guess kiddie kidnapping turns you on?

For a state to illegally remove a child from it's family is the ultimate breach of human rights!

Says the man who talks about my little girls having crabs ..

You are one sick individual!

 

[Ihavenojob]

I don't need to explain.

You mean

 

[gasbanni]

Maybe you'd like to explain that to the windrush generation?

Or the UK kids kidnapped/sent to Australia?

Surely a different subject ?

Firstly the Windrush generation my figures are approx as I can t remember exactly .......... sixty odd seventy odd were sent back of those forty odd were criminals refused the right to return, the ones that should be allowed back number thirty odd individuals.
More a case of bungling public sector/ civil service employees as usual.

Different subject again

UK kids kidnapped and sent to Australia usually they were orphans I believe not that that makes any difference. Again bungling public sector workers.

But really what bearing does that have on people quite illegally entering this country ? The consequences of which are having their kids put in to care while they're locked up .....whose to Soddin blame ? What's your answer or solution ?

 

[EFLImpudence]

It seems the 'story' (mexican children) may be just that; a story.
https://www.nationalreview.com/2018/06/ice-loses-1500-children-myth-shows-media-bias/

It appears we can believe nothing in this era of the politics of confusion - assuming the article is true, of course.

 

[gasbanni]

It seems the 'story' (mexican children) may be just that; a story.
https://www.nationalreview.com/2018/06/ice-loses-1500-children-myth-shows-media-bias/

It appears we can believe nothing in this era of the politics of confusion - assuming the article is true, of course.

Youre quite right actually......but you do know all the waters still here ?

 

[EFLImpudence]

Water ?

 

[JohnD]

It appears we can believe nothing

Is there reason to believe https://www.nationalreview.com/ is a more reliable source than those we have seen saying the opposite?

 

[EFLImpudence]

Did you not read all of my post?

 

[JohnD]

yes.

It might be useful to decide what assumptions (if any) we should make.

For example, I hesitate to believe anyone who asserts that it wasn't raining

 

[Notch7]

https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/national-review/

It has a right wing bias.

 

[JohnD]

and your link says its "Factual Reporting" is "Mixed"

"Overall, we rate the National Review Right Biased based on story selection that always favors the right and Mixed for factual reporting due to misleading claims and occasional use of poor sources. (7/19/2016) Updated (M. Huitsing 6/20/2018)"

 

[EFLImpudence]

Please show which assumptions I have made in linking to an opposite view and stating that:

It seems the 'story' (mexican children) may be just that; a story.
It appears we can believe nothing in this era of the politics of confusion - assuming the article is true, of course.

 

[JohnD]

Are you interpreting "It might be useful to decide what assumptions (if any) we should make."

as an attack?

 

[securespark]

But then I guess kiddie kidnapping turns you on?

That is just out and out weird. Why would you even think that, let alone voice it on a public forum?

 

[SammyInnit]

That is just out and out weird. Why would you even think that, let alone voice it on a public forum?

When all else fails...