Tommy Robinson fight back against BBC corruption

[sodthisforfun]

This is the case in question:

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/ar...-tells-rapists-relatives-terrified-trial.html

The rapists got something like 10 years each, 3 years ago, which means they will probably be out now, and continuing with their valuable contributions to our country.

I see that Vinty is on message... it's the victim's fault.

Yes, that's the one I googled. It's up for all to see, with various news outlets.

https://www.google.co.uk/search?ei=...4......0....1..gws-wiz.......0i71.b8Mlu9mzYO8

As an example, some children were gang raped in a hotel in Manchester a few years ago by muslims (one of whom was related to Salman Abedi the Manchester Arena bomber). During the ensuing trial, the rapists' relatives - burka clad women - harassed and spat at the victims' relatives outside the court daily. This was widely reported at the time but there is little trace of it now on the Internet. It is being expunged from the record!

Unless I've misread and it's the only bit about the victims family being harassed that you think has gone?
In that case:
https://metro.co.uk/2016/02/01/moth...tackers-family-members-after-jailing-5656357/
https://www.express.co.uk/news/uk/6...IFTY-friends-of-sick-Somali-men-harassed-them
https://www.thesun.co.uk/archives/n...ends-and-relatives-harassed-her-during-trial/
And your daily mail link.

It is alleged harassment happened, by the way, no proof so some media may have not published that part anyway. But about the case itself, there's plenty out there to read.

 

[jasonzyx]

The rapists got something like 10 years each, 3 years ago, which means they will probably be out now, and continuing with their valuable contributions to our country.

But you don't seem concerned about the thousands of Catholic supposed spiritual leaders, who have never been brought to justice in the first place?

 

[Bodd]

Tommy Robinson. Is not a racist He's against scum like the above. The terrorist the hate preachers.

He doesn't Hate the good side of Islam, He don't hate.
Indians, Chinese, Africans, West Indians. Plenty of white people I can imagine he doesn't like.

Where the police government and local authority's as well as TV have been sleep walking, he's made sure we all know what's going on..

 

[Bodd]

But you don't seem concerned about the thousands of Catholic supposed spiritual leaders, who have never been brought to justice in the first place?

I'm sure he does as we all do
but this is about Tommy Robinson.

 

[jasonzyx]

I'm sure he does as we all do
but this is about Tommy Robinson.

Is it? It seems to have transformed into a thread highlighting the abuse shown by a small group of Pakistani men.

Why does Tommy Robinson not concern himself with the thousands of Catholic supposedly spiritual leaders?
That abuse has been going on for far longer, is far more widespread, and is far more damaging, and is condoned, excused and hidden by the rest of the supposedly spiritual leaders.

I can provide one answer, because he is fundamentally anti-Islam and therefore fundamentally racist.

Tommy Robinson. Is not a racist

see above.

 

[jasonzyx]

No, I have always said that is wrong - and have proved it above.​

Let us apply a combination of linguistics tests to your theory.
Racial essentialism can apply to the dictionary definition of racism, i.e. the dictionary definition could apply to the racial essentialist concept, or the socially constructed concept.
Now let's apply the same linguistic test of the dictionary definition of antisemitism.
You say that your argument proves the dictionary definition wrong. I say your argument is wrong, and that is why it fails against the dictionary definition.
Whereas the socially constructed concept of antisemitism can apply, and stand along the dictionary definition.

 

[Notch7]

seems to have transformed into a thread highlighting the abuse shown by a small group of Pakistani men

Which is relevant to Tommy Robinson.

You are obsessed with catholic priests. Perhaps you fancy them, who knows......

 

[jasonzyx]

Which is relevant to Tommy Robinson.

Kind of.
But why does he not concern himself with the vastly far more numerous cases of abuse by Catholic priests? (and nuns)

Easy answer: because he is fundamentally racist.

Also, there is a good chance that he is a Catholic himself.

 

[Notch7]

dictionary definition of racism

The dictionary definition is this:

Prejudice, discrimination, or antagonism directed against someone of a different race based on the belief that one's own race is superior


All that carp youve written is not part of the dictionary definition.

Why are you so obsessed with racism.
Are you a racist?

A catholic priest loving racist?

 

[Bodd]

Why does Tommy Robinson not concern himself with the thousands of Catholic supposedly spiritual leaders?

Tommy Robinson tells the stories of growing up in Luton. All faiths wide and far got on.. Apart from a section of Muslims...

I'm sure it went on in Luton with the Catholic Church. Either he was not aware

or it paled in comparison. I don't suppose Catholic priests were marching through the town chanting death to British solders death to the English police. Death to all non Muslims.


He's not a jack of all trades and does not pretend to know about all the abuse by other faiths or groups.

With the exception of the Nazis He let's them have it as well...

 

[Notch7]

But why does he not concern himself with the vastly far more numerous cases of abuse by Catholic priests

I havent heard him talk about the conservation of elephants either. Does that mean he approves of elephant poaching?

Dear oh dear, you should listen to yourself

 

[jasonzyx]

The dictionary definition is this:
Prejudice, discrimination, or antagonism directed against someone of a different race based on the belief that one's own race is superior

Yes I agree with the above. But the racialist argument is that the dictionary definition uses the concept that there are several different races within the human race. And if there are different races, then there are more superior races than others, which is fundamentally racist.
But the socially constructed concept of racism asserts that there is only one human race. Therefore racism, being a socially constructed definition, will vary from society to society.

Now applying the same linguistic test to the dictionary definition of antisemitism, the racialist argument disagrees with the dictionary definition. It fails a linguistic test.
Whereas the socially constructed argument stands along side the dictionary definition in agreement and in parallel.
Therefore the dictionary definition relies on the socially constructed concept of race, not the pure definition of race that racialists rely on.

 

[jasonzyx]

I'm sure it went on in Luton with the Catholic Church. Either he was not aware

or it paled in comparison.

Then he is not well versed in the current goings on in the world.
He prefers to concentrate his prejudice against a small group, in the process ignoring a vastly more widespread problem.

We know why, because he is fundamentally racist.
And he enjoys the support of some members on here.
And they prefer to support someone who is not well versed in current news, the same someone who has a narrow minded prejudice.

 

[Bodd]

I can provide one answer, because he is fundamentally anti-Islam and therefore fundamentally racist.

So if I say I hate Millwall football hooligans, does this meen I dislike all Millwall fans?

 

[Bodd]

Kind of.
But why does he not concern himself with the vastly far more numerous cases of abuse by Catholic priests? (and nuns)

I'm not an expert. But I imagine Catholic priests or nuns in Luton did not number the attacks by Muslim men