Tommy Robinson fight back against BBC corruption

[Notch7]

having civilised, tolerant views

So when you call someone a 'vile scumbag that should be deleted'

.......that is civilised is it?

 

[sodthisforfun]

You just cannot bear the thought that having civilised, tolerant views, an intelligent regard for facts etc, are not aberrations, can you.

There is nothing civilised, intelligent or tolerant about your posts, exact opposite.

 

[jasonzyx]

There is nothing civilised, intelligent or tolerant about your posts, exact opposite.

There is nothing civilised nor tolerant about believing in the philosophy of racial essentialism.
There is nothing intelligent about making the same merry-go-round of invalid arguments, all to no avail.

 

[jasonzyx]

So when you call someone a 'vile scumbag that should be deleted'

.......that is civilised is it?

When you intentionally distort someone's opinion, that should be deleted.
That is not civilised debate.

 

[ban-all-sheds]

So when you call someone a 'vile scumbag that should be deleted'

.......that is civilised is it?

Yes, if it would have the effect of increasing the overall level of civilised behaviour in society.

 

[sodthisforfun]

There is nothing civilised nor tolerant about believing in the philosophy of racial essentialism.
There is nothing intelligent about making the same merry-go-round of invalid arguments, all to no avail.

Nothing intellegent, civilised or tolerant calling people racist without proof.

 

[jasonzyx]

Nothing intellegent, civilised or tolerant calling people racist without proof.

You ascribe to the philosophy of racial essentialism. That is proof.
You can deny it as proof if you want, but without any alternative explanation, hypothesis or proof that you do not ascribe to that ideology, your denial is pointless.

MOD: This thread is done now.