There is nothing civilised nor tolerant about believing in the philosophy of racial essentialism.
There is nothing intelligent about making the same merry-go-round of invalid arguments, all to no avail.
There is nothing civilised nor tolerant about believing in the philosophy of racial essentialism.
There is nothing intelligent about making the same merry-go-round of invalid arguments, all to no avail.
You ascribe to the philosophy of racial essentialism. That is proof.
You can deny it as proof if you want, but without any alternative explanation, hypothesis or proof that you do not ascribe to that ideology, your denial is pointless.