Main Stream Black Out.

So stay away from bananas, your only 40% away from eating a human you savages.
Is the banana stunned before picking? Does wanting to know make me banana-ist?!

Apparently lettuces scream when you pull them out of the ground. Or so my meat eating friends like to tell me.
 
Sponsored Links
Listen, 90% of asian/indian restuarants are halal and business in them.is booming.

If people were really concerned about Halal meat they have a funny way of showing it.

In the end very few people really care about the faux controversy over halal meat. Aside of course from the usual racists, bigots, xenophobes looking to spread hate in this weird world on constant conflict they are trying to create.. yet will still go and eat a halal takeaway...

Seriously just stfu and go eat your kebab.

Pondering further, I wonder how many Muslims and Jewish people eat in restaurants/grab a takeaway in the UK where they don't serve halal or kosher. Such as Burger King, Pret, McDonalds, pizzahut, dominos, greggs, the local sarnie shop and all those other places that cook halal alongside non-halal.
 
... how many Muslims and Jewish people eat in restaurants/grab a takeaway in the UK where they don't serve halal or kosher. Such as Burger King, Pret, McDonalds, pizzahut, dominos, greggs, the local sarnie shop and all those other places that cook halal alongside non-halal.
I think you are the one going crazy. You're contradicting yourself.
If they don't serve halal, how can they cook it alongside non-halal?
 
Is it a proven fact that you supported notch and transam in their abuse? You are doing it now, by trying to argue that it is me that is being abusive.
It is hypocritical of you to complain about abuse when you accuse us of racism based simply on your illogical views on what the word means.

Is it a proven fact that you supported ELFImpudence in his argument that there are different races within the human race? Well that thread has been deleted, but those of us with memories know full well that you did. It would be truly disingenuous of you to deny it.
That is haredly an offence when I have proved how illogical and wrong your views are.

You did not even know how someone could be anti-semitic to someone who was not a Jew .
I explained that to you so you must have been wrong until.

Is it a proven fact that you have accused me of having different names? No doubt about it. You're still doing it.
It is obvious to anyone that you have had several user names therefore none of your other ramblings can be trusted.

Is it a proven fact that we all have subjective opinions? Of course it is, therefore it must also apply to you.
So, you admit it could be you who is wrong.

There you go. How can any of that be jumping to conclusions?
I have just proved it to you.
 
Sponsored Links
I think you are the one going crazy. You're contradicting yourself.
If they don't serve halal, how can they cook it alongside non-halal?
Ooh, did you get really excited about that one? A slim chance to try and lord it over?!

Those concerned about eating food that is halal but can be cross contaminated so becomes haram. Such as fish at Mcdonalds. Fish=OK, cooked in same oil as non-halal chicken = not ok.
 
Oh and:

upload_2019-3-19_1-45-35.png


You posted it so it is not for me to take it up with the author.

Either you think it correct or the rest of your trolling must be equally unreliable.
 

Attachments

  • upload_2019-3-19_1-43-47.png
    upload_2019-3-19_1-43-47.png
    190.2 KB · Views: 56
It is hypocritical of you to complain about abuse when you accuse us of racism based simply on your illogical views on what the word means.
I have posted numerous scientific articles explaining racial essentialism, which is what you believe.
Therefore my allegation of you being a racist is based on those articles, your belief, and your own arguments.


That is haredly an offence when I have proved how illogical and wrong your views are.
Go on then, when are you going to start?

You did not even know how someone could be anti-semitic to someone who was not a Jew
Shall I post up the dictionary definition of antisemitism again?

I explained that to you so you must have been wrong until.
o_O Until what? o_O


It is obvious to anyone that you have had several user names therefore none of your other ramblings can be trusted.
If it is so obvious, please provide some evidence to support the obvious.


So, you admit it could be you who is wrong.
Of course it is possible. But based on the scientific evidence, the articles written by learned professional intelligent people, the consensus of opinion of the scientific world, the dictionary definitions, I some how think that it is not I that is wrong.
Give your outdated, Victorian concept f there being different races within the one human race, I'm betting it is you that is not only wrong, but using that scientifically disproven ideology to sustain your racist attitude.
I suspect that you even go out of your way to reinforce the notion that it is all about pedantry, when it's really about racism. Faux pedantry, if you like.


I have just proved it to you.
You have just given me a load of opinion, your opinion, nothing more Just as my opinion could be subjective, so could yours.
Therefore either of us could be wrong. My opinion is fully and resoundingly supported by scientific evidence, learned articles, etc.
Your opinion is supported by absolutely nothing, is ridiculed by modern science, and is demonstrably a racist ideology.
 
I have posted numerous scientific articles explaining racial essentialism, which is what you believe.
Therefore my allegation of you being a racist is based on those articles, your belief, and your own arguments.



Go on then, when are you going to start?


Shall I post up the dictionary definition of antisemitism again?


o_O Until what? o_O



If it is so obvious, please provide some evidence to support the obvious.



Of course it is possible. But based on the scientific evidence, the articles written by learned professional intelligent people, the consensus of opinion of the scientific world, the dictionary definitions, I some how think that it is not I that is wrong.
Give your outdated, Victorian concept f there being different races within the one human race, I'm betting it is you that is not only wrong, but using that scientifically disproven ideology to sustain your racist attitude.
I suspect that you even go out of your way to reinforce the notion that it is all about pedantry, when it's really about racism. Faux pedantry, if you like.



You have just given me a load of opinion, your opinion, nothing more Just as my opinion could be subjective, so could yours.
Therefore either of us could be wrong. My opinion is fully and resoundingly supported by scientific evidence, learned articles, etc.
Your opinion is supported by absolutely nothing, is ridiculed by modern science, and is demonstrably a racist ideology.

Scientists meaning what ?

Quacks ? :LOL: Hitler had scientists pstudying race and ethnicity

We will
Put your waffle in the same pot :LOL:
 
View attachment 161221

You posted it so it is not for me to take it up with the author.
I reproduced a post, along with a reference to the original article.
May I remind you of the convention of referenced material.
If I provide a part of an article with the reference to that article, it is not my opinion, but that of the author. I use that article to support or disprove my point.

If, however, I reproduce part of an article and I do not supply the reference to that article, I am claiming it as my work, and your disagreement does lie with me.
That post clearly meets the convention of being part of an article that was produced by a different author than me, because I provided the link to that author.
Now could you provide the link to the original so I can check the veracity, the original, etc.?
It's OK, I think I have found it.
 
Last edited:
Oh and:

View attachment 161221

You posted it so it is not for me to take it up with the author.

Either you think it correct or the rest of your trolling must be equally unreliable.
The following paragraph goes on to say:
Using the two most commonly used biological concepts of race, chimpanzees are indeed subdivided into races but humans are not. Adaptive traits, such as skin color, have frequently been used to define races in humans, but such adaptive traits reflect the underlying environmental factor to which they are adaptive and not overall genetic differentiation, and different adaptive traits define discordant groups. There are no objective criteria for choosing one adaptive trait over another to define race. As a consequence, adaptive traits do not define races in humans. Much of the recent scientific literature on human evolution portrays human populations as separate branches on an evolutionary tree. A tree-like structure among humans has been falsified whenever tested, so this practice is scientifically indefensible. It is also socially irresponsible as these pictorial representations of human evolution have more impact on the general public than nuanced phrases in the text of a scientific paper. Humans have much genetic diversity, but the vast majority of this diversity reflects individual uniqueness and not race.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3737365/
 
Last edited:
Oh and:

View attachment 161221

You posted it so it is not for me to take it up with the author.

Either you think it correct or the rest of your trolling must be equally unreliable.
Going back to your original mention of this, you said:
On the subject of scientifically, you said that there were chimpanzees of different races which had a 0.3% difference in genes but people of different 'types' had less than 0.1% and this was not enough to be a different race. I don't know if that is true or who decides that but as it is the sole determinator of the 'types' of people regardless of nationality, ethnicity, religion etc. then whether that results in actual races or it is just a name used for the 'types' is immaterial.​

You also said that different races of species could not breed. This is not true with the Chimpanzees.​

I cannot see any reference to the percentage differences that you refer to with chimps or humans. The original article refers to discordant groups of humans, not types, as you suggest. In fact, because you ran the whole referenced material in with your opinion, it is difficult to differentiate what your are using as referenced material, and what is interspersed with your opinion.

As to your claim that different races of chimps can inter-breed, where is your supporting evidence of this assertion?
Incidentally, there is not different races of species. The same article makes that clear:
The word “race” is not commonly used in the non-human biological literature. Evolutionary biologists have many words for subdivisions within a species
The article also makes clear that race is a socially constructed concept:
A definition of “race” that is specific to one human culture at one point of time in its cultural history is inadequate for this purpose.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3737365/
 
That were later posts, but the facts of the case remain unchanged: two Polish fellas, one of whom died, beaten up by about twenty youths, one of whom was a right thug, in Harlow.


Id say 20 thugs. Who would have attacked this man if he was Polish or English.

The fact is the attack was not racial and not because of Brexit
 
It doesn't necessarily, but that's not the point. The point is that with halal certified produce you are giving money to an evil organisation, an organisation that wants to kill you.
How can kids that are "given" Halal food be contributing to anything? Does death occur after the first bite?
 
Listen, 90% of asian/indian restuarants are halal and business in them.is booming.

If people were really concerned about Halal meat they have a funny way of showing it.

In the end very few people really care about the faux controversy over halal meat. Aside of course from the usual racists, bigots, xenophobes looking to spread hate in this weird world on constant conflict they are trying to create.. yet will still go and eat a halal takeaway...

Seriously just stfu and go eat your kebab.

Isn't Halal meat expensive. Or more so than non Halal meat.... Its not good business to feed halal to punters who don't require or appreciat the way the animal is killed
 
Sponsored Links
Back
Top