White lives don't matter. Stop it now.

[Scarlet Pimpernel]

It looks like sodthisforfun has set an example that a few are keen to follow, Join in the discussion simply to be abusive and for no other reason.

Some people have sad lives.
'Trolls' they're usually called.

Still if those posters feel the need to be abusive, they must also be feeling some sort of guilt for their behaviour.

It's just like I explained before, if you don't share the same ideology as the typical social media abuser, you experience abuse, with the intention of driving you away.
A typical example of how institutional racism works.
Fit in with us, or we'll make your life unpleasant, and if that doesn't work, you'll be expelled anyway.

 

[transam]

It looks like sodthisforfun has set an example that a few are keen to follow, Join in the discussion simply to be abusive and for no other reason.

Some people have sad lives.
'Trolls' they're usually called.

Abuse the irony

What example has she set

 

[Ihavenojob]

The queue was down the corridor for brian's

Must have been shut when you went, so you went back to the arseh0le department and got another where your mouth should have been.

 

[Ihavenojob]

Some people have sad lives.
'Trolls' they're usually called.

And spend all their time posting on a forum, nearly a thousand posts a month.

 

[EddieM]

Well I certainly remember a user called Blightymam.

 

[Bodd]

A young couple have I would fncked up their lives..... Foolish fools

https://www.mirror.co.uk/sport/football/news/girlfriend-burnley-fan-behind-banner-22241110

Maybe have to do crowd funding jib for them.

 

[EFLImpudence]

This is all getting silly.

I don't care about the couple but the banner was hardly "vile" was it?
People are just saying and writing things they think they should.

 

[fillyboy]

This is all getting silly.

I don't care about the couple but the banner was hardly "vile" was it?
People are just saying and writing things they think they should.

No, it wasn't vile at all. Food nonetheless for psychopaths like Bobby Vajazzler and her halfwitted followers to gorge on.

 

[sodthisforfun]

You have a very vivid imagination.
You should try putting it to good use.

Blightymam doesn't exist, never did. Any posts by Blightymam have either been expunged form the records, or Blightymam has had a name change.

Well, I found stuff just fine.
Interestingly responding to one of your user names...?
Looks like you were wrong - again Himmy.

It looks like sodthisforfun has set an example that a few are keen to follow, Join in the discussion simply to be abusive and for no other reason.

Some people have sad lives.
'Trolls' they're usually called.

Still if those posters feel the need to be abusive, they must also be feeling some sort of guilt for their behaviour.

It's just like I explained before, if you don't share the same ideology as the typical social media abuser, you experience abuse, with the intention of driving you away.
A typical example of how institutional racism works.
Fit in with us, or we'll make your life unpleasant, and if that doesn't work, you'll be expelled anyway.

Aww, Himmy's upset.
If you don't like it... nobody is forcing you to stay.

 

[JP_]

Good, they should be dragged behind a horse, no matter what their political leanings.(if guilty)

Surely it shouldn't be more than 12 weeks' imprisonment, maybe suspended for 12 months - that's all Tommy Robinson got for headbutting somebody.

 

[sodthisforfun]

This is all getting silly.

I don't care about the couple but the banner was hardly "vile" was it?
People are just saying and writing things they think they should.

No, the banner on it's own isn't vile. Put into context though and while still not vile, it wasn't a good move.

 

[fillyboy]

No, the banner on it's own isn't vile. Put into context though and while still not vile, it wasn't a good move.

Sometimes getting up in the morning isn't a good move, putting that into context though, so what?

 

[sodthisforfun]

Sometimes getting up in the morning isn't a good move, putting that into context though, so what?

Do what?!

No, it wasn't vile at all. Food nonetheless for psychopaths like Bobby Vajazzler and her halfwitted followers to gorge on.

Who are those halfwitted followers? Does Himmy have followers?

 

[fillyboy]

No, the banner on it's own isn't vile. Put into context though and while still not vile, it wasn't a good move.

Is this what bookies would call an each way bet? Why agree with EFL that the banner isn't vile, and then add a little disclaimer that more or less translates to 'but it is really'.
It seems a little pointless.

 

[sodthisforfun]

Is this what bookies would call an each way bet? Why agree with EFL that the banner isn't vile, and then add a little disclaimer that more or less translates to 'but it is really'.
It seems a little pointless.

https://news.sky.com/story/the-misconceptions-behind-the-white-lives-matter-banner-12013727

Vile is a strong word, I don't think it's vile. Simple really.