Ryler doesn't know.
Is there no difference between "reducing transmission" and "eliminating transmission?"
Is there no difference between "reducing transmission" and "eliminating transmission?"
Can you name a single case
Is there no difference between "reducing transmission" and "eliminating transmission?"
Are you sure?
Is there no difference between "reducing transmission" and "eliminating transmission?"
...you are also saying then is that wearing a face covering , hand sanitising, physical screens and social distancing are ineffective.
My question was addressed to the person who wrongly said
They reduce transmission, so they are not ineffective
They do not eliminate transmission, therefore visitors increase the risk.
Your inference is incorrect.
They reduce transmission
Unless you're just trolling me again.
So if transmission is reduced as you claim then people must have been infected under such measures in the first place?
No very little of this occurred in the early days.
Like I said, take it up with the person who said it.
What exactly are you saying?
You seem to be claiming that social distancing of 10 feet, and a large screen barrier are useless.
I did, that's you.
Yes it is somewhat effective,