NEWSFLASH -sue grays report!!

Johnson desperately trying to throw mud at Starmer.

Today it’s the claim Starmer didn’t prosecute Jimmy Saville when he was head of CPS - despite the fact he was not reviewing lawyer in the case.
Really? The best he could was to regurgitate disproven Facebook conspiracies...
"Keir Starmer failed to prosecute Jimmy Saville and the Labour front bench take drugs..."

Spineless lying tw@t.
 

Attachments

  • upload_2022-1-31_21-50-45.png
    upload_2022-1-31_21-50-45.png
    68 bytes · Views: 55
Sue Gray report states 12 out of 16 parties committed criminal offences.

No, it doesn't state that at all.


11.The police have confirmed that on the basis of the information available the gatherings on these four dates are not considered to have reached the threshold for criminal investigation. 12. No conclusions should be drawn, or inferences made from this other than it is now for the police to consider the relevant material in relation to those incidents. The police have also said this does not in itself mean that they will decide to take further action or that there has necessarily been a breach of the regulations. 13.At the request of the police I have provided the material compiled in the course of my investigation relevant to the gatherings that they are now investigating. I have also been asked to retain all the other information collected in the course of this work, which I have confirmed that I will do. I will therefore ensure the secure storage and safekeeping of all the information gathered until such time as it may be required further. I will not be circulating the information internally within government, it has been provided in confidence to the Cabinet Office investigation team and it is important that this confidence is maintained to protect the integrity of the process.
 
No, it doesn't state that at all
It’s phrased in a way to protect the LIAR



out of 16 parties, the Gray report can only talk about 4 because the others are subject to criminal investigation.

ERGO 12 parties were criminal.



Johnson is a dead man walking now, he is only still there because the Tories want him to roll him in sh1t so they can wipe the slate clean when they get the next liar in
 
It’s phrased in a way to protect the LIAR



out of 16 parties, the Gray report can only talk about 4 because the others are subject to criminal investigation.

ERGO 12 parties were criminal.



Johnson is a dead man walking now, he is only still there because the Tories want him to roll him in sh1t so they can wipe the slate clean when they get the next liar in
Dick will make sure sod all will be done...

After all what's a 'party inquiry' compared to getting away with being in charge of a police execution!

'lessons will be learned' blah blah...
 
Well, Boris has said sorry.
Isn't that enough.
Even Boris recognises that is not enough:
Boris Johnson says "it is not enough to say sorry" as Sue Gray report published

Sue Gray's report showing findings of her investigation into parties at No 10 during the coronavirus lockdowns was published in part on January 31.
Prime Minister Boris Johnson made a statement on the findings in parliament, in which he apologised, but said "it is not enough to say sorry."
He said he would make changes to the Cabinet Office in order to learn from the report.
He said: "I get it and I will fix it and I want to say to the people of this country, I know what the issue is, it's whether this government can be trusted to deliver and I say yes we can be trusted to deliver."
https://www.lincolnshirelive.co.uk/news/local-news/boris-johnson-says-it-not-6579067
So please someone correct me if I've got this wrong:
Boris was at some of these parties, and Sue Gray has said he was, but a) he didn't realise they were parties, b) he told parliament that all the rules were followed, and c) he doesn't know if he was at some of these parties and he needs to wait until the Met have investigated, despite Sue Gray already saying he was at some of them.

Now he's been told that there was a serious lack of leadership at number 10, of which he is the big boss, a serious lack of judgement, an excess of alcohol consumption, and a disregard for the rules, and he wants us to trust him, the one who's been sacked for lying before, (not to mention all his other misdemeanours) to put things right?
Does he take us all for fools?
Clearly his ardent supporters are fools because even now that they continue to support him, and think he'll change his habits of a lifetime.

Think about this:
It's been recognised that the bureaucracy at number 10 has become an institution to support itself.
So Boris's proposal is to enlarge it even further with additional personnel.

Many of you voted for this lying buffoon.
Many of us knew exactly what he had been like, and we warned you what an utter mess he would make of the office. But you ignored our warnings, and you voted for him, his policies and his party.
It's all your fault, all of those whose mind was blinkered to focus on that single issue, Brexit, that you ignored all the warnings of having a gutless lying buffoon as PM.

I hope you are now ashamed of your choices, but somehow, I suspect you'll do the usual, and bluff and bluster, deflect and divert.
 
Last edited:
I notice Michael Gove has occupied Boris's fridge.

Maybe it was the mention of drugs that caused him to snort and disappear.

How many politicians can you get in one fridge?
I suppose it depends on the size of their egos, and the baggage of lies that they carry with them.
 
That's all some of the folk on here have. Permantly outraged by stuff that has no real effect on them. It's as if they like being upset.
My sister passed away during the height of the restrictions, not from Covid. But because of the restrictions, which we all respected and obeyed, we were unable to visit her prior to her passing away, and unable to attend her funeral, and unable to gather together as a family.
I'll leave it to your imagination to consider our 'outrage' at the gutless lying buffoon that has told so many lies, from as long as he has been in the public eye, through Brexit, and now as PM.
Leopards don't change their spots.
There needs to be a massive clear out of number 10, including the inept leader, with poor judgement.
 
There is a lot of interpretation of the law in that report. I think a prosecution will fail because of how the law was drafted at the time, along with the "it was a work event" defence, reasonable honest belief etc.. In addition, I'm not sure the lockdown 1 and 2 legislation allows for historic offences to be dealt with. You must be asked to account at the time. They may be able to pin something on the organiser.
 
There is a lot of interpretation of the law in that report. I think a prosecution will fail because of how the law was drafted at the time, along with the "it was a work event" defence, reasonable honest belief etc.. In addition, I'm not sure the lockdown 1 and 2 legislation allows for historic offences to be dealt with. You must be asked to account at the time. They may be able to pin something on the organiser.

This just shows how disgusting Johnson is -h has worked out by raising the bar to a criminal investigation the Met will fail to prosecute
the raving Johnson nutters like Fillyboy will be able to claim "Johnson is completely exonerated"
 
Back
Top