No, we don’t.If she is found guilty, we need to understand her mentality and reasons for such crimes.

No, we don’t.If she is found guilty, we need to understand her mentality and reasons for such crimes.
I could imagine Roy Bloom and his alter ego saying such a thing.No, we don’t.


Ey?Two shakes of a rat's tail.

Didn’t catch it, but I think they are presenting a case to the criminal case review commission who have the power to refer the case to the court who can order a retrial. But from what you say the courts or parliament would have to change the law to allow the case to be re heard. Farrage is on board and thinks there should be a retrial.Her barrister was saying that when he hands in his appeal if the (is it the cps) think that the evidence could have been used in the original trial it'll be thrown out...potentially leaving an innocent women in prison for life...
Madness...

If her legal team thought that had legs, she'd be out in two shakes of a rat's tail.

Watch the documentary, its an eye openerIf her legal team thought that had legs, she'd be out in two shakes of a rat's tail.
That really isn't how the justice system works.If her legal team thought that had legs, she'd be out in two shakes of a rat's tail.
If you understand the reasons then you have a chance to stop the next one.No, we don’t.

Twisted in the head is the only reason. You can’t legislate for that.If you understand the reasons then you have a chance to stop the next one.
Understanding doesn't mean forgiveness.

Think it was on ITV so ITVX probablyWill do.
iPlayer?
They clearly do, but the process to review the case is understandably challengingIf her legal team thought that had legs, she'd be out in two shakes of a rat's tail.