Climate Change

Based on what?
Based on the fact that you don't know.
This is the same "study" done by the midget in London where they calculated pollution if they didn't impose the ULEZ.
How do you calculate something that it's not happened?
At best is a guess, a wild guess aimed at scaring people and tax the last penny out of us.
Can you predict what would happen if tomorrow I don't go out?
 
Based on the fact that you don't know.
This is the same "study" done by the midget in London where they calculated pollution if they didn't impose the ULEZ.
How do you calculate something that it's not happened?
At best is a guess, a wild guess aimed at scaring people and tax the last penny out of us.
Can you predict what would happen if tomorrow I don't go out?
one less polluting poltroon on the road?
 
Aveatry tried to claim that higher levels of CO2 were beneficial to the global climate.

Aveatry claimed optimal crop growing was 1000ppm CO2 and you quoted some text to back it up….not realising what you quoted came from a book about commercial greenhouse horticulture.

Aveatry won’t admit it
that would give about 6 to 8° global warming (10 to 12° on land) many of the most densely populated areas in the tropics would become uninhabitable, those that escaped the raging wars would be paddling over the channel in a small boat - LOL
 
that would give about 6 to 8° global warming (10 to 12° on land) many of the most densely populated areas in the tropics would become uninhabitable, those that escaped the raging wars would be paddling over the channel in a small boat - LOL
But the problem is that you are responding to lies from Notch. - Remember its notch - the same notch that misquotes - the same notch that says xxx thinks -- whatever. He is the forum liar.
 
Glad to see that notch has edited his post and removed his little weasel remark
View attachment 395870
Why are some people described as weasels?

A = because weasels are known as sneaky and deceitful

people who are weasels use weasel words:

a weasel word, or anonymous authority, is a word or phrase aimed at creating an impression that something specific and meaningful has been said, when in fact only a vague, ambiguous, or irrelevant claim has been communicated. The terms may be considered informal. Examples include the phrases "some people say", "it is thought", and "researchers believe". Using weasel words may allow one to later deny (a.k.a., "weasel out of") any specific meaning if the statement is challenged, because the statement was never specific in the first place.



this is an example of a weasel:

a person that tried to claim that higher levels of CO2 were beneficial to the global climate.

a person that claimed optimal crop growing was 1000ppm CO2 and you quoted some text to back it up….what you quoted came from a book about commercial greenhouse horticulture.
 
that would give about 6 to 8° global warming (10 to 12° on land) many of the most densely populated areas in the tropics would become uninhabitable, those that escaped the raging wars would be paddling over the channel in a small boat - LOL
this was Aveatrys original post

1760514838307.png
 
But the problem is that you are responding to lies from Notch. - Remember its notch - the same notch that misquotes - the same notch that says xxx thinks -- whatever. He is the forum liar.
it is not a lie though

here is what you posted

1760514976995.png


1760514886860.png
 
But the problem is that you are responding to lies from Notch. - Remember its notch - the same notch that misquotes - the same notch that says xxx thinks -- whatever. He is the forum liar.
there is an animal that describes that sort of post.....can anybody think what it is :ROFLMAO:
 
one less polluting poltroon on the road?
What about if I use all my appliances at once, turn heating on, shower 10 times and burn wood in my open fire?
You see, your prediction was totally wrong.
Had I been out, I would've probably been on foot visiting parks and rivers: no pollution.
There are so many factors involving climate that any prediction is just a wild guess.
And of course, the 0.1% use this to tax us to the bones whilst they get richer and more powerful.
 
What about if I use all my appliances at once, turn heating on, shower 10 times and burn wood in my open fire?
You see, your prediction was totally wrong.
Had I been out, I would've probably been on foot visiting parks and rivers: no pollution.
There are so many factors involving climate that any prediction is just a wild guess.
And of course, the 0.1% use this to tax us to the bones whilst they get richer and more powerful.
payup and shut up.
 
And of course, the 0.1% use this to tax us to the bones whilst they get richer and more powerful.
the massive rise in energy prices since 2022 has been due to global pricing of oil

so you are moaning about cost of electricity and gas going up so much because of fossil fuels

oh and the reason electricity prices are so high is because they are tagged to gas power stations not renewables
 
it is not a lie though

here is what you posted

View attachment 395877

View attachment 395876


None of that says this though does it ---
You tried to claim that higher levels of CO2 were beneficial to the global climate.
That bit is your lie - that bit was-- and has always been in your head and your lie.
Everything I posted was just facts -anyone can google them you added the rest and then posted it as if that is what I said --
I never said --- higher levels of CO2 were beneficial to the global climate. - that is your lie.
 
What it shows is that fickos are being conned by the Reform party.

Reform party….funded by oil industry
GBnews…..funded by oil industry
Aveatry……brainwashed by the oil industry.

You are a little weasel


There is a link between conspiracy theorists and in cells

Looks like notch has now edited his other post 58 mins ago to ADD his little weasel remark--- reported
Thank you Mods - it has now been removed. And his other insult post has gone.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top