Climate change.

[tony1851]

No-one on this thread has explained why the experts got it so wrong in predicting dreadful outcomes with all the diseases I mentioned

I don't recall the experts getting it wrong. You must have been reading the mail again.

I don't read comics.

 

[Norcon]

You've already admitted to reading the beano.
Probably more truth in it than the mail.

 

[chapeau]

I'm off to 'Building' and 'Building Regulations and Planning Permission' now, where folk are a bit more down to earth. See ya.

Ha Ha Ha. Now we know yer bonkers. Though there is enough hot air from the Woody and Freddy Show to melt the Arctic icecaps - maybe you can explain it like that?

 

[AronSearle]

I don't recall the experts getting it wrong.

Which experts?

You seem to talk about them as some amorphous blob.

Many predictions have been wrong and unproven, some have been correct.

Nobody clued up deny's CO2 affects the atmosphere, but many "experts" as you call them, make varying claims as to how much. Varying from warming being logarithmic and only a few degrees, to warming being exponential and magnified by positive feedback effects, the latter being the worrying scenario, and also the most likely to be wrong.

Metertologists and climatologists predicted the long cold tail off too this winter due to north pole ice melt and they were 100% accurate.

Cart before the horse.

They couldn't explain the cold winters a few years ago, and then came up with this as an explanation, their "prediction" was that it would happen again for a few years.

And then of course it's only a theory with plenty of people pointing out it's a bit flawed (like the north pole temps are colder now than 3 years ago).