Seems very much the case
Not surprising considering you'd rather see protestors shot rather than arrested.
Troll
DORK.
Or they are warming up to the idea they are unsafe.
I met a lady at a conference who works for a charity dealing with miscarriages. Opened my eyes. She wasn’t some woolly do gooder either. Tough as they come because so many crims try it on.
Lettby didn’t exercise the right to silence at interview or in the dock, she cooperated and answered all their questions. Almost unheard of nowadays, innocent or guilty. Like a lamb to the slaughter.
The CPS have, but Plod just carried on regardless and passed the buck up the line. If the basis of the new charges was statistical correlation and shift patterns, but no direct evidence (as before) it’s hardly surprising they aren’t pursuing the prospective charges.
Was there anything gained from the interviews that worked against her? It hasn't been focused much in any of the documentaries.
Only as part of the confirmation bias of the whole case. Going to a funeral and sending a condolence card were all part of the evil plan. Other nurses that attended funerals weren’t charged with murder
but this was not learned via interview?
It was put to her at interview and her responses were shown to the jury.
A (slim) chance of acquittal, if she were guilty. The defence concentrating on the weak circumstantial case. Little point if innocent but the police have all sorts of techniques to trip the unwary. Like implying a sinister motive to a nurse googling her patients and wanting to go to the funeral.
But how do they judge an innocent person who fully cooperates but has the weight of so called experts pitted against her? I suspect the defence or their experts weren’t fully up to the task.
