Dunblane denial

[noseall]

It's still confected outrage

From whom?

Are you saying the families of the victims are wrong to be outraged?

 

[securespark]

Quell surprise!

Quelle.

 

[wobs]

The argument for/against guns is here:
Part1:

Part2:

Some naughty words used, so NSFW

 

[aveatry]

It's still confected outrage

From whom?
Are you saying the families of the victims are wrong to be outraged?

Scumbag.

Do you have a link at least?
I also know very little about Rupert Lowe other than he is a scumbag and has been in the news recently.

I read what he said about the Dunblane victims (and has since retracted).
I'll likely get banned if I post what I'd like to write.

Scumbag. Belongs in the gutter with that other corrupt swindling scrounger hero of yours, Fromage.

OOF (@ liar-f)

Scumbag.

 

[IT Minion]

It's still confected outrage

Outrage over it seems excessive. Scorn and derision is appropriate. What sort of idiot weighs in on gun control in the UK and doesn't know about Dunblane?

 

[noseall]

Scorn and derision is appropriate.

Scumbag

 

[noseall]

From whom?

Are you saying the families of the victims are wrong to be outraged?

I guess he doesn't know.

 

[noseall]

Outrage over it seems excessive.

From the families of those affected?

 

[IT Minion]

From the families of those affected?

From them yes, from the general public no.

 

[warey4life]

Inevitably, a manufactured Rupert Lowe scandal after the manufactured Farage one. Nobody in the real world is falling for it bluppers.

Manufacture by Farage and Lowe.

 

[morqthana]

I await with interest* to see Highway Man warning aveatry about excessive bold font use here: https://www.diynot.com/diy/threads/dunblane-denial.659069/post-6287315 and threatening to report him.

And also complaints from any number of people that just changing the formatting in a quote counts as falsification.

* But no expectation, given the 2-tier standards we have here.