D
durhamplumber
And you carry on educating yourself via youtube whackos.PROVEN HISTORY in courts of law of LYING !!!!
And you carry on educating yourself via youtube whackos.PROVEN HISTORY in courts of law of LYING !!!!
A friend of a friend of his sister who knows someone who works in a hospital saw an empty room
Flu cases in the last twelve months may have been drastically reduced for several reasons:When flu cases have stopped suddenly in the last two years.
Flu cases in the last twelve months may have been drastically reduced for several reasons:
face masks
social distancing
lockdowns
hand hygiene.
reduced social interaction, e.g. home working, closed schools, etc.
All of these are effective protections against flu, just as much as against Covid.
I for one, have not bothered with the flu' vaccine this year due to those protection measures. Normally i would ensure that I received the jab.
Not all, the same principle applies, absence of evidence does not prove evidence of absence.Ridiculous comparison
They haven't re-introduced it, they've simply said that the absence of evidence does not prove the evidence of absence.The WHO originally played down this theory, why do you think they reintroduced it, they are definitely not conspiracy theorists.
It can be applied to any and all non-proven theories.Again, conspiratorial nonsense.
And one does expect it to be the dominant theory among Trumpists, and other xenophobes and bigots.Well one would not expect it to be the dominant theory in China..........
The WHO have said that they can't disprove it. They wouldn't be able to disprove that it came on a meteorite from outer space neither.And now apparently the WHO...........
The non-proven theory has been doing the rounds for about 12 months.Do you really think the WHO would bring this up at random, or to be mischievous.
No-one suggests that any of these measures are adequate protection.You keep believing that & your world is all hunky dory.
Flu is a virus & none of what you cling to is adequate protection against a virus.
It is only disgusting to you because you are not used to such markets. There are plenty of reciprocal instance that appear to be disgusting to Chinese. Not so much now but decades ago, it was considered really disgusting that western cultures did not bathe as regularly as eastern cultures, ot hat they did not change their clothes frequently.I think the most plausible cause is these disgusting 'wet markets' in China where Animals that are seldom in contact with each other are kept in high numbers in close confines. It is the perfect breeding ground for new viruses to emerge!
Still very interesting that it is believed to have come from a wet market close to a viral research centre where it is rumoured that animals that had been used in experiments where sometimes sold as food in these wet markets rather than being incinerated.
It is just horrendous how we treat other creatures.
They already have in some people's minds.This will leave space for other theories and with the ramping up of Sinophobia by the media and the politicians these theories could be elevated to the status of fact.
believed to have come from a wet market
Not all, the same principle applies, absence of evidence does not prove evidence of absence.
They haven't re-introduced it, they've simply said that the absence of evidence does not prove the evidence of absence.
It can be applied to all non-proven theories.
It can be applied to any and all non-proven theories.
And one does expect it to be the dominant theory among Trumpists, and other xenophobes and bigots.
The WHO have said that they can't disprove it. They wouldn't be able to disprove that it came on a meteorite from outer space neither.
The non-proven theory has been doing the rounds for about 12 months.
The WHO is scheduled to visit the Wuhan Institute of Virology. Researchers there handled coronaviruses but have rejected claims that COVID-19 emerged as the result of a leak. Dr Daszak told Sky NewsYou think that WHO made those claims, brought it up, then rejected it? Are you for real?
"We're all aware of the hypotheses around the potential involvement of the lab in this and we're certainly going to ask questions about all of the key aspects of the Wuhan Institute of Virology.
"If there are data that point towards any hypothesis, we'll follow the data, we'll follow the evidence where it leads us. If it leads us to a seafood market and a cold chain, we'll follow it there.
"If it leads us to a wildlife farm or a wildlife market we'll go there. If it leads us to a lab we'll go there. Everything's on the table and we're keeping an open mind."
from your link
They'll still need permission from the appropriate government.WHO can visit as many Research labs as they want