- Joined
- 10 Aug 2025
- Messages
- 1,930
- Reaction score
- 1,671
- Country

Yes, it's a crime. Not just in my eyes - and regardless of what you compare it to.Enjoying a toke or two among friends without bothering the world at large is a crime in your eyes?

Yes, it's a crime. Not just in my eyes - and regardless of what you compare it to.Enjoying a toke or two among friends without bothering the world at large is a crime in your eyes?
I have no idea what you are talking about,
A whole cocktail of them based on your posts
I don't know why you make up such nonsense


You asked me if I knew what drugs you take, I gave you my reply, it was a guess not a fact so I have made up nothing.You have no idea what YOU are talking about.
I don't know why you make up such nonsense.

I most certainly do not, I am a 100% no tolerance for such things.He's trying to dance around the fact that he too takes recreational drugs, illegally.
Ask me if i give a dusty f. what you think.Yes, it's a crime. Not just in my eyes - and regardless of what you compare it to.
I most certainly do not, I am a 100% no tolerance for such things.
You asked me if I knew what drugs you take
John would love to see us as a nation of drug users and turn pubs into drug dens.

Only because you are getting away with it!Ask me if i give a dusty f. what you think.

Could you show me the untrue allegation?After you published an untrue allegation
And you made up an untrue reply.

Why is there any need for a more tolerent attitude? What would benefit the population?post#645: Overall, there is a crucial need for more high-quality research. Given the scarcity of evidence, the routine use of cannabinoids for the treatment of mental disorders and SUDs is currently rarely justified. the Lancet
Opponents of decriminalisation often do not read reports into research of cannabis, or cherry pick the negative aspects of addiction, linking crime statistics alongside cannabis use as a way of demonising the majority of people who use the noble herb peacefully. The Dutch policy of allowing a small amount of cannabis for personal use is a sensible step towards a more tolerant attitude.
Well, it would avoid all kinds of clutter in the courts, dealing with widdling amounts of drug use for a start.Why is there any need for a more tolerent attitude? What would benefit the population?

I don't think you get prosecuted for small amounts for personal use anyway, doubt the courts are clogged up with such cases but maybe clogged up from dealers and criminal users.Well, it would avoid all kinds of clutter in the courts, dealing with widdling amounts of drug use for a start.
Why would you break a butterfly on a wheel?