After the riots

[joe-90]

Did they evict all the Council Tenants that were convicted like they said they were going to?

Yeah sure they did. Just a load of hot air as usual.

 

[Gasman28]

Did they evict all the Council Tenants that were convicted like they said they were going to?

Yeah sure they did. Just a load of hot air as usual.

All very well evicting them, but where do they go? Possibly to a Housing Association house where the Local Council will have to pay for them. As much as I want to see these scumbags hit hard, it could be that the tax payer would still have to pay for them.

 

[joe-90]

Then why the charade of saying they would be evicted? It makes the government look weak or stupid.

 

[imamartian]

i agree Joe... it needs documenting.... we need to be able to folllow such stories.....

 

[Gasman28]

Then why the charade of saying they would be evicted? It makes the government look weak or stupid.

I'll make you right there. I can only assume that the leader of the Council stated on TV that because they had broken their terms of tenancy, therefore they would be evicted. All very well being the big cheese on TV, then backing down. Could it be that the Liberal Guardian reading do-gooders have poked their noses in and claimed that the scumbags human rights have been infringed?

 

[Mickymoody]

It's impractical to do, as they would need to be rehomed elsewhere, and costly I suppose? So why do in the first place?

 

[Karinska]

If the person involved in the riots is the main tenant and therefore in breach of the T&Cs of their tenancy, the Council has no legal duty to re-house them as they will be considered to have made themselves 'intentionally' homeless.

 

[Mickymoody]

If the person involved in the riots is the main tenant and therefore in breach of the T&Cs of their tenancy, the Council has no legal duty to re-house them as they will be considered to have made themselves 'intentionally' homeless.

But human rights would suggest that they are breaking their own laws, and depriving people of their human rights, and their cat.

Like the laws that suggest people on the dole, don't look for work, so get their benefits stopped. It's a legal requirement. You can't force people to be homeless. However benefits are often halted and delayed.

 

[Alarm]

Like the laws that suggest people on the dole, don't look for work, so get their benefits stopped. It's a legal requirement. You can't force people to be homeless. However benefits are often halted and delayed.

From experience?

 

[spacecat]

What a pointless thing to do, so 13 year old nicks a bottle of coke and his while family inc disabled granny mum dad and siblings get evicted

Meanwhile MPs nicking thousands for years keep their jobs,
Cameron practically in bed with News International keeps his job

The HYPOCRISY stinks