I wouldn't, I can control my temper.
It would be more helpful to understand your position if you had answered the question I asked, "
IF you went up to someone and..." not a question I did not ask, e.g. "
Would you go up to someone and...".
But if you'd prefer, I'll ask it in a different way.
If person A went up to person B in a pub and hit them because they didn't like them, do you think it would be B's fault if a fight started?
Whilst I don't doubt your acedemic or vocational intelligence, I sometimes think you're idea of interpersonal skill is just on a different wavelength to many others.
My interpersonal skills are just fine, but unfortunately they are not up to dealing with people who think that it's OK to accuse me of criminality when they have no evidence, who think it's OK to say that I'd be better off with 4 lights on 1 or 2 switches than 4 but repeatedly refuse to explain why, who think that it's OK to say I've written something incredibly stupid when I've actually written the same as them, and so on.
I don't think your dogged persevereance is always to your benefit but I wouldn't be surprised if you disagree with me.
For as long as there are people here who think that the interests of the forum are best served by them deliberately choosing to misinterpret my posts by imagining I've written words that I have not, or imagining that they can hear a tone of voice which they don't like, and then proceeding to resurrect the disagreements of their own invention in topic after topic after topic, nothing is going to be to my benefit, is it?