Are you preparing for the incoming collapse of the UK ?

[noseall]

With the incoming collapse of the UK imminent and civil war approaching, how are you preparing yourself ?

Self-defence courses and survival skills seem like the most obvious choice..

I've booked a holiday.,

 

[HawkEye244]

Erm.... it's "they're", not "their"...

FFS...

17 minutes, to be more precise ..

 

[securespark]

Well, I did make and eat my dinner.

 

[HawkEye244]

Well, I did make and eat my dinner.

You are forgiven

 

[Highway Man]

Yes please. Quicker than it takes to cook my roast

Exactly, I have always said get them off their inflatables, feed them egg and chips for the humanity side of things, assess them whilst eating, by the time they have finished their food, give them medical assistance if required then ship them straight out to Rwanda for processinng. It is the only way to stop this invasion.

 

[MNW67]

Oven -- proper old school.
Or should I say ' old skool'

Me too! I still haven't bought an air fryer.

 

[MNW67]

feed them egg and chips

I love egg and chips! Sometimes on its own, sometimes with beans.

 

[GhostIntMachine]

Erm, ... ''legally'' .. you mean having to face a bunch of unelected judges from blocking a deportation mandate given to the government by the people ?

Parliament passes laws. Judges determine how those laws should be interpreted but always with reference to legal precedent. It's how Iour legsl system works. Judges don't create laws and they don't take instructions on outcomes of cases from politicians - unlike Stalin's Russia, for example, or Hitler's Germany for that matter. If parliament presents the judiciary with a law which contradicts earlier statutes and precedents then it id parliament, not the judiciary, who is at fault. So having a "deportation mandate" did any party ever actually have that?) but then not ensuring that all the appropriate robust legislation is put in place is a failing of the government, not of the judiciary. Or are you saying that you want to live in a totalitarian state where the courts merely rubber stamp the president's will? If so I'd recommend Russia.

 

[Deleted member 317777]

What do you mean?

What you say about it, it’s basically meaningless

 

[GhostIntMachine]

Me too! I still haven't bought an air fryer.

Do it. You'll wonder how you've ver did without

 

[HawkEye244]

Parliament passes laws. Judges determine how those laws should be interpreted but always with reference to legal precedent. It's how Iour legsl system works. Judges don't create laws and they don't take instructions on outcomes of cases from politicians - unlike Stalin's Russia, for example, or Hitler's Germany for that matter. If parliament presents the judiciary with a law which contradicts earlier statutes and precedents then it id parliament, not the judiciary, who is at fault. So having a "deportation mandate" did any party ever actually have that?) but then not ensuring that all the appropriate robust legislation is put in place is a failing of the government, not of the judiciary. Or are you saying that you want to live in a totalitarian state where the courts merely rubber stamp the president's will? If so I'd recommend Russia.

We already live in a totalitarian state in case you hadn't noticed. People are currently sat in prison for posting opinions on the internet - over 12,000 arrests were made in the UK in 2023 via the government using the Communications Act. This is significantly more than Russia. AND these statistics are from 2023, before most of the stupid people in this country woke up to what has been happening for the past 30 years.

 

[GhostIntMachine]

Really? Seems to me, from what you wrote, that you'd like a state like Russia. You want to deport people without due process, despite us having laws which give them at least some rights. I don't like quite a few of the immigrants I've had to work with (do you ever associate with immigrants, or is your view of things second hand?) but they aren't all chiselling gits. Some of them are actually decent human beings. A few are actually friends. Maybe instead of talking down people who aren't white, middle class English you should talk to some of them?

 

[johnny2007]

Parliament passes laws. Judges determine how those laws should be interpreted but always with reference to legal precedent. It's how Iour legsl system works. Judges don't create laws and they don't take instructions on outcomes of cases from politicians - unlike Stalin's Russia, for example, or Hitler's Germany for that matter. If parliament presents the judiciary with a law which contradicts earlier statutes and precedents then it id parliament, not the judiciary, who is at fault. So having a "deportation mandate" did any party ever actually have that?) but then not ensuring that all the appropriate robust legislation is put in place is a failing of the government, not of the judiciary. Or are you saying that you want to live in a totalitarian state where the courts merely rubber stamp the president's will? If so I'd recommend Russia.

Himmy, you're back so soon???

 

[GhostIntMachine]

How'd you guess?

 

[GhostIntMachine]

Remind me... Just who is Himmy?