B
I know you are!Silly person.
With what ? I think you have finally lost the plot.ihatemyjob seems to have a problem.
And what do you think you mean?True to form Joand is defending the indefensible .
...an arrestable offence of failure to
"get out of your vehicle."
"hand over your keys."
With what ? I think you have finally lost the plot.
The police thought it was the drivers cousin TJ, and according the daily mail report, he'd already shown them his ID, but they refused to believe it because they were convinced it was TJ, - as they kept repeating it - who I assume wasn't allowed to drive.
I don't think many would (or have) justify this coppers behaviour in this situation and I do hope the driver sues the police and the copper gets a criminal damage record to his name. He was totally unprofessional.On this occasion i don't think he has. If you want to live in a society where you can have your property smashed up and you skull smashed up try south Africa. We have laws in this country you can't have coppers going around smashing people up because they don't like the look of them. I know the reason some of those in the thread are siding with the copper its because the guy is black, attitude problem, probably sells drugs to get the money to buy that nice car... deserves a good beating maybe? Maybe so. However copper cannot be allowed to be morally justified in using criminal force in order to police and this is the fact of the matter because who next? You? Me? Fancy a batton to the skull for not answering his questions quick enough? No i don't either. I think some of you lads have lost your minds on this one.
I don't think many would (or have) justify this coppers behaviour in this situation and I do hope the driver sues the police and the copper gets a criminal damage record to his name. He was totally unprofessional.
go back to the miners strike & look at police behaviour