the people on this thread who believe in climate change arent using those emotive slogans
Climate: The Movie
- Thread starter berty3000
- Start date
- Status
Every time you hide behind "strawman" means you have no argument.
And why would you want to argue against the world governments creating the money to save the world.
And "printing money" is exactly what has been done to supply ukraine with arms
Last edited:
Eh- are you reading the same posts as I am.
Ah I see what you did there -- CLIMATE CHANGE - everyone believes its changing I don't think anyone is arguing against that.
please point out posts on this thread which contain these phrases:
global huge threat to humanity,
existential threat to humanity
global boiling -
the seas dying
I told you it was a strawman and explained why
it is a given that climate change refers to Anthropogenic climate change
Without going through all the pages here are the 2 most resent ones
What about Nobel Laureates who actually work in the field of climate change?
Climate change is 'huge threat to humanity', physics Nobel Prize winner warns
Dr Giorgio Parisi, 73, won the 2021 Nobel Prize for Physics on Tuesday alongside fellow scientists Japanese-born American Dr Syukuro Manabe and German Dr Klaus Hasselmann.news.sky.com
And the "existential threat to humanity" was from a link to a paper that someone posted
A few years.
11 yr cycle, from minimum, through maximum, back to minimum (or maximum>minimum>maximum, if you prefer. But they amount to the same thing).
Astronomers are pretty confident on the 11-yr cyclicity; they've been formally recording it since the mid-1700's.
We're approaching a solar maximum, this or next year.
I posted a link to a film thinking it was an interesting and more unusual perspective that doesn't follow the usual doom laden narrative and which people might enjoy watching. That is all. Not setting out to prove anything.
My own opinion on the subject, which I've already explained, is that the matter is not settled, that there is a high degree of uncertainty, and that we should allow the scientific process to work in the normal way so that all avenues are explored. That is it. That is my view.
You on the other hand are clearly dogmatic and I have politely asked you to help us understand your perspective using rigorous scientific sources. The fact that you are now flapping and are unable to do so makes we wonder how you have ended up with such a high level of confidence. Care to explain?
The offer is still there - please comply with the stated criteria.
We are still learning about our nearest star and the 11 year is not the only cycle it has.
Not to mention the earths 100,000 year cycle around the Sun with a 23 percent difference in the incoming solar radiation.
How is me paying extra tax going to stop the planets from orbiting the sun that effect our own orbit.
We are all being had.
Yes climate change is a thing - yes we want clean water and air yes a tiny part of it is man made - no there is nothing we can do to stop the natural cycle of the solar system. If you want to spend money on anything it should be on things that allow us to adapt to the change. Letting pensioners die in cold homes I suppose is one way of tackling the problem.
- Joined
- 25 Jul 2022
- Messages
- 17,901
- Reaction score
- 1,502
- Country
- Joined
- 25 Jul 2022
- Messages
- 17,901
- Reaction score
- 1,502
- Country
At last. Some sanity.
Is man making it worse, or not?
Its a very simple question ? Prepared to answer it?
He has done when he said man has made a tiny part of it. Buck up.
No way of knowing with any certainty based on the available data.
Eh?
- Status
