I think it's fewer than Cummings considers acceptable.
how many is Cummings willing to accept?
Oh no. That game again.
I asked STFF.
I think it's fewer than Cummings considers acceptable.
how many is Cummings willing to accept?
The easiest deal in history?Remind me, what did Doris say was "Oven Ready?"
What a response to a jokey post - such seriousness! You must be fun at partiesHow many deaths are "scientists" willing to accept?
That's how it works. Two weeks is the typical time between infection and resulting death on average.The lockdown was only introduced two weeks before that date. That was quick.
I do wish you'd be less wrong about everything Covid-19. Seriously, you get it wrong in almost every way.I do wish you wouldn't argue with me.
Anyway - Are you thinking of the incubation period (infection to symptoms) which may itself be two weeks?
OK.What a response to a jokey post - such seriousness! You must be fun at parties
All I said was "That was quick" in response to the claim that the lockdown caused a reduction in deaths from April 9th.I do wish you'd be less wrong about everything Covid-19. Seriously, you get it wrong in almost every way.
Ok but that can be two weeks itself as your link states.No, I'm not thinking of the incubation period.
What is?I know it's the mail but they're just reporting the results of a study, it's 18 days by the best guess.
They're a stopped clock, sometimes they're correct. The telegraph had it too but is behind a paywall.I take it sometimes the Mail is alright so, in future, that won't be a reason to dismiss everything independent journalists write for it.
Yeah, not a good advert for the Barrington declaration.Did you read about the young man who (apparently) got covid twice? The second time much nastier.
Did you read about the young man who (apparently) got covid twice? The second time much nastier.
Yeah, not a good advert for the Barrington declaration.
Yep, THE young man.Did you read about the young man who (apparently) got covid twice? The second time much nastier.