But surely photographs can serve to reinforce the memory of the abuse, by the abuser?? This is why serial abusers/killers often keep "mementoes" of their crimes. (do some research at least Boss)
Nah, the police have done the right thing in my mind... If anything, it's the law that's now failing the victim. (as it so bloody often does)
But surely photographs can serve to reinforce the memory of the abuse, by the abuser?? This is why serial abusers/killers often keep "mementoes" of their crimes. (do some research at least Boss)
"Society made me do it Gov. I'm just the product of my upbringing".Nah, the police have done the right thing in my mind... If anything, it's the law that's now failing the victim. (as it so bloody often does)
I agree. Having seen some of the 'sentences' passed these days, I've come to the conclusion that the law is now there to protect the poor misunderstood criminal.
Blimey, caja, I'm impressed. We've had our differences but that post of yours had a much further sighted view than I've seen you express before.As distasteful as it is to have the victim thinking that he has photos of her, the police must follow the law, they do not 'decide' what is appropriate, that is a matter for us the public, and the courts.
Them going ahead and deleting them is virtually guaranteeing a civil compensation claim against them from the convict, and that goes against their duty of care towards our public funds.
I agree, but where does one draw a line over who should have family photographs
Its something that has made news headlines and there is no real answer .
Come on, BT, surely if it was a real deal, then it should be debated and decided in Parliament, and we'd (well not me, but you know what I mean, although I suppose I could write to an MP, despite not being on the "roll") all have the opportunity to make our views felt.Which is, quite often, AN ASS!
I have a BIG problem when it comes to 'might over right'. (No matter how democratic).
It assumes that the majority who vote make the right decision or know what they're voting for.
But since we don't have a better system. ....?
If he's really wierd, he might put his foot in his mouth when he opens it.One cannot help but wonder why the convicted paedophile actually wants these pictures One may wish to query his motives and as such reconsider the length of his custodial sentence, especially when his request for parole came up before the panel!
One cannot help but hope that by "shooting" himself in the sheet and handkerchief, he has in fact shot himself in the foot!!!
Eh? Weird you may be (as indeed are we all), bit not an excuse for a permanent breakIf he's really wierd, he might put his foot in his mouth when he opens it.One cannot help but wonder why the convicted paedophile actually wants these pictures One may wish to query his motives and as such reconsider the length of his custodial sentence, especially when his request for parole came up before the panel!
One cannot help but hope that by "shooting" himself in the sheet and handkerchief, he has in fact shot himself in the foot!!!
Gawd, I can't believe I typed that.
I think it's time I signed off....for good that is, not just tonight.
When you get as bad as the inmates, it's time to call it a day.Eh? Weird you may be (as indeed are we all), bit not an excuse for a permanent break