Hypothetical question

[sodthisforfun]

Look EFL, if you carry on like this I'll see you outside at closing time.

Oooh, you're so 'ard.

 

[Ryler]

but anyone who supports private landlords living abroad being stripped of their propery for no recompense gets my vote.

So steal from hard working people and give it to the spongers. Any one voting for that deserves to lose and live in rented squalor for all eternity.
corbyn and his henchman mc donnel are history and good riddance.
socialists always run out of other peoples money

 

[Notch7]

socialists always run out of other peoples money

Yet Tories borrow more than Labour.

Seems like your old trope is bollards.

 

[Ryler]

Yet Tories borrow more than Labour.

Seems like your old trope is bollards.

Labour have never managed to leave government with a smaller deficit than they started.
LoL.
You are trying to say that the Tories have borrowed more than Labour – but are totally ignoring the fact that no government starts with a clean sheet and a zero budget deficit/surplus.

 

[sodthisforfun]

Labour have never managed to leave government with a smaller deficit than they started.

Have the tories? Just out of interest.

 

[Bodd]

Have the tories? Just out of interest.

Have they?

 

[Notch7]

Labour have never managed to leave government with a smaller deficit than they started.
LoL.
You are trying to say that the Tories have borrowed more than Labour – but are totally ignoring the fact that no government starts with a clean sheet and a zero budget deficit/surplus.

Unfortunately you are wrong.
The facts orove what you clain is untrue.



Debunking the myth that Tories are better than Labour with the economy
Contrary to widespread perceptions, the economy performs no worse under Labour than under the Tories—by some measures it does much better
In contrast to myths about Labour widening the deficit (i.e., when spending exceeds revenue), data shows that the deficit stabilised under both the post-WWII Labour and Tory governments. By 1970, Labour’s Wilson had brought the deficit down to nearly minus 2 per cent of GDP. But within four years, the Tories under Edward Heath had increasedthe deficit. It peaked under Wilson (1974-76) and the oil crisis at nearly 8 per cent, before slowly declining. Thatcher brought the deficit down to Wilson’s late-60s-early-‘70s levels. But under Thatcher and Major, the deficit shot up again only to be gradually reduced by New Labour

Recessions
Since 1955 there have been 14 recessions, 10 of which were under Tories.

https://www.thelondoneconomic.com/b...re-better-than-labour-with-the-economy/19/11/

 

[Bodd]

Unfortunately you are wrong.
The facts orove what you clain is untrue.



Debunking the myth that Tories are better than Labour with the economy
Contrary to widespread perceptions, the economy performs no worse under Labour than under the Tories—by some measures it does much better
In contrast to myths about Labour widening the deficit (i.e., when spending exceeds revenue), data shows that the deficit stabilised under both the post-WWII Labour and Tory governments. By 1970, Labour’s Wilson had brought the deficit down to nearly minus 2 per cent of GDP. But within four years, the Tories under Edward Heath had increasedthe deficit. It peaked under Wilson (1974-76) and the oil crisis at nearly 8 per cent, before slowly declining. Thatcher brought the deficit down to Wilson’s late-60s-early-‘70s levels. But under Thatcher and Major, the deficit shot up again only to be gradually reduced by New Labour

Recessions
Since 1955 there have been 14 recessions, 10 of which were under Tories.

https://www.thelondoneconomic.com/b...re-better-than-labour-with-the-economy/19/11/

My god Man....... You've totally got it wrong...

You voted for Brexit. Yet you regretted it

You voted Conservative all your life yet you did'nt agree with how they run country....

When you get it wrong... You really get it wrong

 

[Ryler]

Unfortunately you are wrong.
The facts orove what you clain is untrue.



Debunking the myth that Tories are better than Labour with the economy
Contrary to widespread perceptions, the economy performs no worse under Labour than under the Tories—by some measures it does much better
In contrast to myths about Labour widening the deficit (i.e., when spending exceeds revenue), data shows that the deficit stabilised under both the post-WWII Labour and Tory governments. By 1970, Labour’s Wilson had brought the deficit down to nearly minus 2 per cent of GDP. But within four years, the Tories under Edward Heath had increasedthe deficit. It peaked under Wilson (1974-76) and the oil crisis at nearly 8 per cent, before slowly declining. Thatcher brought the deficit down to Wilson’s late-60s-early-‘70s levels. But under Thatcher and Major, the deficit shot up again only to be gradually reduced by New Labour

Recessions
Since 1955 there have been 14 recessions, 10 of which were under Tories.

https://www.thelondoneconomic.com/b...re-better-than-labour-with-the-economy/19/11/

You would be better off just saying how much each government has increased or decreased the budget deficit. At which point the numbers look pretty unfavourable to labour.
Your analysis is basic beyond measure. You can’t seriously blame one government for it’s predecessors failings.
I do note a tone of hysteria in your post.

 

[Notch7]

My god Man....... You've totally got it wrong...

You voted for Brexit. Yet you regretted it

You voted Conservative all your life yet you did'nt agree with how they run country....

When you get it wrong... You really get it wrong

Facts have become more clear since 2016, nothing wrong with changing opinion in light of new evidence.
Sign of higher intelligence

I didnt say I didnt agree with how the Conservative run the country, did I?

Behave yourself

 

[Bodd]

Facts have become more clear since 2016, nothing wrong with changing opinion in light of new evidence.
Sign of higher intelligence

I didnt say I didnt agree with how the Conservative run the country, did I?

Behave yourself

New facts old facts. You got it wrong.

I'm just saying.

 

[Notch7]

You would be better off just saying how much each government has increased or decreased the budget deficit. At which point the numbers look pretty unfavourable to labour.
Your analysis is basic beyond measure. You can’t seriously blame one government for it’s predecessors failings.
I do note a tone of hysteria in your post.

Ryler starts ad hom attacks, because he has lost the arguments.

Nevermind Ryler, Im always happy to debunk your stereotyped hogwash


PS:
10 recessions under Tory
4 recessions under Labour.

 

[Ryler]

Ryler starts ad hom attacks, because he has lost the arguments.

Nevermind Ryler, Im always happy to debunk your stereotyped hogwash


PS:
10 recessions under Tory
4 recessions under Labour.

Plagiarising hogwash from your favourite tory bashing biased web sites that don't show the whole picture means you debunk didly squat.
Your economics understanding is below that of a GCSE student and it is misleading to the point of lying.

 

[sodthisforfun]

Have they?

Has Ryler answered yet Bodd?

 

[Bodd]

Has Ryler answered yet Bodd?

No he hasn't Sod... But you know don't you.