Is the GD Forum for......

[Himaginn]

Question for himmy: Do you class a post as hateful if it contains the truth?

No doubt you'll claim that the persistent, repetitive, racist, hateful comments that you continually make are the truth.
You may believe your messages to be truthful, but how can messages of hate and bigotry be the truth?
How can accusing someone of defending peadophilia be considered as truthful?
I'm firmly convinced that you couldn't discern what is truth and what isn't.

To answer your question as though it wasn't a loaded question, the truth can be hurtful but only if hurt is intended, but that isn't what we're discussing.
We're discussing whether the RWR should be allowed to monopolise a GD forum on a DIY site that was designed for the benefit of all the members, not just the hate-filled few.

 

[DRM]

I'll ask you again, what do you want to discuss?

 

[sooey]

Yep you should be banned again worm tongue. People make honest comments which you then twist or totally misrepresent, causing nothing but disruption and confusion to topics of quite huge interest, with your excessive use of quotes and deliberate habit of taking things out of context.
You also use the forum to throw around your accusations of "racist", "homophobe", "sexist", "liar" at anyone whose posts you don't like, knowing there's no chance of retribution being taken.
Try going down to your local boozer and spouting off in there like you do on here, and let me know when you're going, and I'll come and pick your teeth up for you.
You are a major disruption to the normal people on here who are trying to have a discussion. That is why you have been banned so many times before.

 

[woodbine]

How can accusing someone of defending peadophilia be considered as truthful?

Once again this has been twisted. The accusation was excusing a section of society from accusations of paedophilia, not excusing paedophilia.

 

[JohnD]

Who have you accused of this:

The accusation was excusing a section of society from accusations of paedophilia

show us examples of them doing it.

 

[woodbine]

No doubt you'll claim that the persistent, repetitive, racist, hateful comments that you continually make are the truth.
You may believe your messages to be truthful, but how can messages of hate and bigotry be the truth?

It's you who has decided that certain posts are hate or bigotry. Can you tell me which of my posts are actually untruthful? Any specific accusations I make are normally backed up with links to credible media sources and videos.

 

[woodbine]

Who have you accused of this:


show us examples of them doing it.

There are specialist websites catering to that sort of thing, if that's what floats your boat, Johnny. I'll leave it for you to trawl the dark depths of the internet.

 

[JohnD]

Once again this has been twisted by Woodbine.

Who have you accused of this:

The accusation was excusing a section of society from accusations of paedophilia

show us examples of them doing it.

That's a "no" then.

He's just making this up.

 

[woodbine]

That's a "no" then.

He's just making this up.

You haven't shown me where I called you a paedophile yet. So makes you look very hypocritical to accuse me of swerving your questions, when you avoided one of mine only yesterday. Are all the left gutless worm-tongues?

 

[JohnD]

show us examples of them doing it.

 

[JohnD]

Oh well, slugs like woodbine are too deceitful to engage in adult discussion.

 

[HawkEye244]

No doubt you'll claim that the persistent, repetitive, racist, hateful comments that you continually make are the truth.
You may believe your messages to be truthful, but how can messages of hate and bigotry be the truth?
How can accusing someone of defending peadophilia be considered as truthful?
I'm firmly convinced that you couldn't discern what is truth and what isn't.

To answer your question as though it wasn't a loaded question, the truth can be hurtful but only if hurt is intended, but that isn't what we're discussing.
We're discussing whether the RWR should be allowed to monopolise a GD forum on a DIY site that was designed for the benefit of all the members, not just the hate-filled few.

I think you post a lot of boring shyte and very often if there is a lot of unpleasant flaming on here it's you involved in it.

 

[JohnD]

Here he is, the little slug. I expect his screen and keyboard are splattered with his hate filled bile.

No more revolting than someone who is from a class of people who are happy to dismiss foreign paedophiles in northern cities, a cult that throws gays off of tall buildings, molests women in German cities, abuses Jews so they are leaving Europe in big numbers and revels in animal cruelty. You are truly a 'revolting', bedwetting, hypocritical. cowardly, duplicitous, appeasing, treacherous, pathetic, sensationalist worm-tongue, who would sell your country down the river for whatever trendy bandwagon cause the capitalist run left-wing tells you to. Silly LITTLE 'man'.

A heap of insane accusations, none of them true.

What a pathetic old fellow.

 

[JohnD]

Do you class a post as hateful if it contains the truth?

In the example above, your post is hateful, and does not contain the truth.

Do you have a drink problem, or is it some kind of disorder?

 

[transam]

There you go he has altered the quote again

twice in a row