You know full well that such posting are deleted PDQ, so it's pointless posting them again.
But you can do your own searching, on such terms as Arabs, pickpockets, Romanians, etc. in the search for box, and put your username in the 'by who' box.
Liz Truss Said
- Thread starter securespark
- Start date
But you can do your own searching, on such terms as Arabs, pickpockets, Romanians, etc. in the search for box, and put your username in the 'by who' box.
So they remain on the site but are deleted if quoted? Why? Total rubbish from you. If you think that’s true, send it to me in a PM. Screenshot it though so that I can’t deny receiving it.
Last edited:
D
Deleted member 174758
By blokes with pitch forks , obviously. Vote mob!
Good point. Probably why it's (Benidorm) not on any school curriculum.
I get that you are not a fan of education.
Last edited:
The posts quoting your anti-foreigner posts are deleted, not the original posts. Although they are invariably locked to prevent quoting or further discussion.
Sorted. Watch your wallets.
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/ar...1Z0gFE2ncu0Qy0aOm8DNcYYraZxnlrH_0zVmqK6iaCn3E
Need any more?
Last edited:
All factual stories. Again, where’s the hatred?
Yep thought about it, are you two, Arabs then?
It's along the same lines as Mottie complaining about Arabs during the time when it's common for some rich young Arabic people to visit UK and congregate at somewhere like Covent Garden. But Mottie doesn't complain about white people congregating at say, a football match, even though it's just as normal. It's all about complaining about one thing perfectly normal concerning foreigners, and not moaning about something else perfectly normal but not concerning foreigners. Do you appreciate the one different, obvious factor?
You asked a daft question abut why do I and some specific other poster often appear together.
But you never thought to ask why do I and any other different specific posters often appear together.
You see your question was predicated on an assumption, a daft assumption at that.
If your question had not been predicated on such a daft assumption, it would either have never entered your consciousness, or it would have been phrased in a more open ended fashion.
Additionally, if we appeared together at unusual hours in the quiet periods, it would be OK to think it's a little strange. But if we happen to appear at around the same sort of busy times, then that would be perfectly normal and coincidental.
Like customers coming into a shop in two's or three's or four's in the middle of the night, compared to the same thing happening during the rush hour. Some things are normal and expected, others are unusual. If you choose to remark on the normal and expected as though it's unusual and unexpected, there would have to be something weird about you. Perhaps you've assumed the answer, perhaps your mind is twisted out of kilter, perhaps you're trying to say something but are scared to say it out loud for fear of ridicule?
Similarly Motties 'observation' was based on the Arabs being in Covent Garden as some sort of anomaly. It's like going to Heathrow Airport and moaning about foreigners. They have as much right to be there as anyone else, and it's a perfectly normal occurrence, not some sort of anomaly.
Only a daft assumption underlying the question, (or in Moaner's case, observation), produces a daft conclusion.
For the umpteenth time, where was the complaining?
My original post that you posted above:
"Just got back from Covent Garden. Absolutely full of Arabs. You would think you were in some middle eastern country. Then I realised - it’s crazy rich Arab month."
Note the words in bold and underlined.
How did you know about that Pat? You only joined in august this year...
I've explained several times, in response to other similar queries, and allegations, as I'm supposed to have had a myriad of previous usernames. In a naturally curious way, I tried searching on some of these previous usernames to see what all the fuss was about. Invariably those names don't exist, but occasionally during that process several previous discussions have been noticed. Naturally, I followed some of those discussions. One of those discussions, over a protracted period of time, concerned Mottie and his observation of being overrun by Arabs. In following that thread (as in over multiple threads) it became obvious that this issue has been discussed many times over.How did you know about that Pat? You only joined in august this year...
Each time Mottie remonstrating that his observation displayed no sign of hatred against foreigners, or at other times he'd claim that he wasn't complaining about foreigners.
The most recent claim by Mottie was that he wasn't complaining about Arabs. Yet see his original comment, (which he redacted to omit the relevant complaining) (easily identifiable by searching under the criteria "Arabs" by "Mottie" in " Date Order", and going for the earliest), for which he felt the need to create a new thread:
That thread has been locked, but it's easily found via the search function. There's several pages discussing this very topic. It is discussed again and again in other threads.
Now, as I explained to Charlie George, it's a perfectly normal occurrence, in London to see foreigners of all sorts. Anyone, especially someone who lives in or near London, expects anything different is out of their mind. Then to complain about it, bringing up issues of unpaid fines, etc. is an anti-foreigner rant by any stretch of the imagination. It's exactly the same as blaming failed asylum seekers for not going home after their application has been refused. It's the fault of the system for it not working, not the victims.
It would be like you going to Hednesford raceway, during a race, and complaining about the noise. What do you expect?
Or me going to the zoo and complaining that there's too many animals.
Motties has at other times claimed to be able to differentiate between Romanian pickpockets, and your common or garden type of pickpockets. Quite how he manages that, is anyone's guess.
Sorted. Watch your wallets.
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/ar...1Z0gFE2ncu0Qy0aOm8DNcYYraZxnlrH_0zVmqK6iaCn3E
Then, there's the perennial problem of someone starting a thread (Mottie on this occasion) to complain about foreigners, instantly dog whistles all the other anti-foreigner sympathisers to add their pennyworth of anti-foreigner sentiment.
It's a repetitive occurrence in this forum.
Mottie is a persistent and frequent anti-foreigner poster.
The next time he visits London, he might be advised to study this site, for areas he'd want to avoid:
Arab Areas in London For an Alternative Look at London!
Visit these Arab areas in London for taste of the Middle East and Asia with Middle Eastern Restaurants in Soho, Knightsbridge, Edgeware Road and more!
thewanderingquinn.com
Perhaps Mottie would like this site to alter its messages for Arabs:
An Arab Guide To: London - Scoop Empire
There is no debate about the fact that Arabs love London. The English Capital is one of the most visited cities by Arab tourists, and hundreds of thousands of Arabs made London their home. The city is known for its rich history, cosmopolitan nature, amazing shopping spots, unique tourist...
scoopempire.com
Last edited:
FFS don’t search 'mottie' and 'furlough' otherwise your head might explode! 
Nae bother. I can cope with massive amounts of data, just as I can ignore irrelevant comments, if I choose.FFS don’t search 'mottie' and 'furlough' otherwise your head might explode!
Just couldn’t ignore that comment though, could you?
Similar threads
- longdogs
- General Discussion