Looks like Starmer

My point was pertinent.

Just because you don't like it, doesn't invalidate it.
You're not as clever as you think.
You have simply extracted a few words of my post and said "So?".
You made no point, apart that you try to take lessons from the modern manual of the corrupt politician.
 
You're not as clever as you think.
You have simply extracted a few words of my post and said "So?".
You made no point, apart that you try to take lessons from the modern manual of the corrupt politician.

When refuting carp is differing hues, what is a reasoned rebuttal of one will not necessarily be so for the others.


Hence, refute each on its own (de)merits (y)
 
Anyway, back to the point.


Show me where there is any obligation under the refugee convention (to which we are a founder and signatory, AFAIK) on the person claiming asylum to do as you said they should.
 
OIP (14).jpg


Oh, sorry. I thought you meant post something that looks like him.
 
Anyway, back to the point.


Show me where there is any obligation under the refugee convention (to which we are a founder and signatory, AFAIK) on the person claiming asylum to do as you said they should.
The obligation comes in the form of forced removal
 
Oh you want the law..

Here you go..

I've actually lost track of all the legal changes. Is there any chance you could just summarise your point in a couple of sentences? I don't really want to read a 72 page essay :)
 
Anyway, back to the point.


Show me where there is any obligation under the refugee convention (to which we are a founder and signatory, AFAIK) on the person claiming asylum to do as you said they should.

This is what I have found so far from the House of Commons library:

The UK Government’s position is that refugees should claim asylum in the first safe country they reach. The UN Refugee Agency says this is not required by the Refugee Convention or international law.

 
"The UK Government’s position is that refugees should claim asylum in the first safe country they reach. The UN Refugee Agency says this is not required by the Refugee Convention or international law."

MBK either didn't understand my request

Show me where there is any obligation under the refugee convention (to which we are a founder and signatory, AFAIK) on the person claiming asylum to do as you said they should.


or chose to give an irrelevant response, as a relevant one would have undermined his and Johnny's position.
 
"The UK Government’s position is that refugees should claim asylum in the first safe country they reach. The UN Refugee Agency says this is not required by the Refugee Convention or international law."

MBK either didn't understand my request




or chose to give an irrelevant response, as a relevant one would have undermined his and Johnny's position.
Imagine 100k young strong Russians crossing all of Europe, aided by all governments to reach their preferred safe place (UK) where to apply for asylum.
Then, once let's say in Germany, these "legal" migrant, change their mind and occupy Berlin.
Or, they really come to UK and occupy London.
See how flawed your boll@x is?
 
Imagine 100k young strong Russians crossing all of Europe, aided by all governments to reach their preferred safe place (UK) where to apply for asylum.
Then, once let's say in Germany, these "legal" migrant, change their mind and occupy Berlin.
Or, they really come to UK and occupy London.
See how flawed your boll@x is?




"The Refugee Convention".


100k young strong Russians crossing all of Europe


What were you saying about
flawed.....boll@x

?
 
Back
Top