OMG what do you have to do to prove you are innocent, all of the world leading experts saying she isn't guilty but a numpty with no experience of this says that you are guilty, they listen to him. I have no faith in the judicial system.
I will do, I love anything like this. Such a miscarriage of justice. Not great for the children parents either.
She has better lawyers and the evidence would be subject to more scrutiny
More a case of the court making sure the evidence is properly scrutinised. But that is really down to defence advocates
Can they not now say the conviction she has been handed previous be now open for the same scrutiny
No. Not due to this decision not to prosecute. They can argue they’ve already presented the “best” ones. Of course if she was acquitted of these new charges it would cause some political issues which they are clearly not interested in fuelling.
But how can the world's leading experts, 6 of them all say she isn't guilty when an average Dr used a paper and interpretted it incorrectly and the author of that paper told them so? Surely the whole prosecution was based upon that
As I recall her original problem was that no expert witness were willing to put their jobs on the line by acting as her defence. In addition her legal team couldn’t get their head around the statistics. Add to the fact that she scrawled a “confession” and is probably a bit of an odd ball and you have a case that’s not going to go well
So she could now sit in prison for the rest of her life and could well be innocent?
It may he the other way round, the uncertainty of the current convictions makes a jury less likely to convict.
It makes a difference to the parents of the babies...
The state will fight to the last to prevent her overturning her convictions...
Of course it does, that is what I said.
No, you said 'what makes these further nine so different?'
