Mandelson

Except it's not "again", is it.

Re the alleged "dodging" of CGT from the sale of her house in 2024, the police investigated, and didn't charge her with anything.

The council looked into it wrt where she was registered to vote, and the basis on which she was paying council tax, and said everything was OK.

HMRC looked into it, and decided no tax was due.

So you don't believe GMP.

You don't believe Stockport Council.

You don't believe HMRC.

Is there any end to the number of official bodies you refuse to believe, and decisions which you refuse to accept?

BTW - still waiting for you to show proportionate postings and expressions of outrage about Nadhim Zahawi's "dodging" of over 90 times the amount of tax vs Angela Rayner's stamp duty.
Why is it that these Reform types turn a blind eye to Farage's dodgy financial affairs, but when a Labour woman slips up they are up in arms about it?
 
As I’ve already said HMRC have a limited time to collect underpaid taxes. It doesn’t mean they weren’t owed.

This time they are in time and she needs to pay… she hasn’t. Again.

JohnD pretends not to understand and hides while the Himmys talk to themselves to distract readers from his lies.
 
It doesn’t mean they weren’t owed.

Nor does it mean they were, no matter what you think.

BTW - still waiting for you to show proportionate postings and expressions of outrage about Nadhim Zahawi's "dodging" of over 90 times the amount of tax vs Angela Rayner's stamp duty.
 
Ange's tax bill is pretty insignificant in the light of Epsteen/Mandleson scandal. Starmmer's in the toaster but not yet toast. Maybe he'll try to hold on till the result of the by election.
 
Ange's tax bill is pretty insignificant in the light of Epsteen/Mandleson scandal. Starmmer's in the toaster but not yet toast. Maybe he'll try to hold on till the result of the by election.

Ask yourself how either compare to a glass of Sauvignon and a slice of birthday cake?
 
Nor does it mean they were, no matter what you think.

BTW - still waiting for you to show proportionate postings and expressions of outrage about Nadhim Zahawi's "dodging" of over 90 times the amount of tax vs Angela Rayner's stamp duty.

Zawahi was a Tory

And not a woman


So of no interest to the Chicken's resentment gland again.
 
Note how motorbiking was quite happy carrying on having a go at Angela Rayner, but as soon as I asked him this:
He ran away like this:
It's their MO.
They make loads of allegations, accusations and implications, but when asked to explain or justify their comments, they slip and slide away, or respond with gibberish.
 
Ok can someone translate this for me.. I guess this is himmy logic.

How..if it were true (what?) how would it negate what points? Oh I give up putting back on ignore.

Just to add.. We put up with years of Tory Lies and now the same with Liebour . I do like Kemi I don't like the rest of them I do like some of reform but I don't like most of them.. honestly I don't know the answer but I do support having a revamp of how our country is run. One is more on accountability and pride in the core values of Britain, whilst we try to run as a cesspit for the worlds problems with the corruption at the root we are going nowhere.
All MPs in cabinet need to stop treating us like idiots stop feeding us bs. Alot of us are astute business men and women and see right through the way they make decisions primarily in their own interests not the country. That must stop. Now.
There you go push that through your hate filled ideology translator.
It makes sense in context:
1770604138182.png

But you need to be able to put sentences into context, not read them as stand alone comments.
 
The usual trolls lose the argument and then

I would personally like to see more Business people go in to politics and less career politicians. We have too many with failed careers who turn to politics because they are basically useless.
Business people never fail, are never corrupt, never fiddle the system, never commit financial crime?
What an idealistic world you live in.
 
Back
Top