Mandelson

Ask yourself how either compare to a glass of Sauvignon and a slice of birthday cake?
The opinion of the man who thinks the IDF is the most moral army in the world, but it is responsible for the highest percentage of children killed in any conflict in the last two decades.
 
The opinion of the man who thinks the IDF is the most moral army in the world, but it is responsible for the highest percentage of children killed in any conflict in the last two decades.
The IDF is not responsible . Hamas is . They teach the kids how to throw petrol bombs so maybe direct your blame at the correct TERRORIST organisation
 
The IDF is not responsible . Hamas is . They teach the kids how to throw petrol bombs so maybe direct your blame at the correct TERRORIST organisation
The vast majority of children killed by IDF were killed by bombs or tank fire.
“The need for a ceasefire could not be more urgent. Since Saturday morning, at least 14 children have reportedly been killed, as intense bombing and shelling by Israel continue to hit Gaza City and other areas.

Why or how could a child have motivated such violence?

Children in Gaza killed by cold and collapsing buildings as conditions gnaw away at daily life​


Why or how could a petrol bomb cause this?

“In the last two years, a staggering 64,000 children have reportedly been killed or maimed across the Gaza Strip, including at least 1,000 babies. We don’t know how many more have died due to preventable illnesses or are buried under the rubble.

Relentless Israeli bombardment has killed at least 31 Palestinians, including six children and several police officers, in Gaza, a day before the Rafah border crossing is due to reopen.

At least 1,009 of the children killed were under age one
I'm amazed that under 1 year-old children can lift a pertrol bomb, never mind be taught to throw it.

Your blatant denial of the obvious is clouding your judgement.
 
Last edited:
Ask yourself how either compare to a glass of Sauvignon and a slice of birthday cake?
Both relatively minor in thd grand scheme of things happening in the world except CGT liability doesn’t spread Covid.
 
Deliberately spreading polio and other diseases with the intention of killing children, as Israel did, has nothing to do with warfare.

However it is motivated by racist hatred and genocide.
 
If I put myself forward as a candidate to be PM I’d expect the public to scrutinise my affairs. If I’d made a lot of noise about others tax, I’d expect to be targeted and I’d want to be squeaky clean.

When I owe tax I pay it immediately. Ange doesn’t. Maybe she thinks only wealthy Tories should pay all the taxes? There is zero excuse for her not paying what she owed.

Yvette cooper would do a better job than Starmer or any of the Labour wannabes. Rayner would destroy the country.
 
Who is seriously putting Ange forward as leader?, apart from herself and a few colleagues. She will probably come back into office simply because she is popular with elements of the party. But they would be mad to get rid of Starmer before the by election. He should go to the country if things are bad.
 
Who is seriously putting Ange forward as leader?, apart from herself and a few colleagues. She will probably come back into office simply because she is popular with elements of the party. But they would be mad to get rid of Starmer before the by election. He should go to the country if things are bad.
According to an AI summary:
  • Candidate Fractional OddsImplied Probability
    Angela Rayner13/8 to 9/430.8% – 38.1%
    Wes Streeting3/1 to 5/116.7% – 25.0%
    Andy Burnham6/1 to 9/110.0% – 14.3%
    Shabana Mahmood7/1 to 8/111.1% – 12.5%
    Ed Miliband15/2 to 14/16.7% – 11.8%
    April / June - is the forecast for a leadership challenge.
 
Last edited:
According to an AI summary:
  • CandidateFractional OddsImplied Probability
    Angela Rayner13/8 to 9/430.8% – 38.1%
    Wes Streeting3/1 to 5/116.7% – 25.0%
    Andy Burnham6/1 to 9/110.0% – 14.3%
    Shabana Mahmood7/1 to 8/111.1% – 12.5%
    Ed Miliband15/2 to 14/16.7% – 11.8%
    April / June - is the forecast for a leadership challenge.
I suspect AI here is like betting on the bookie’s favourite, it only enriches the bookies.
 
We are in the middle of a crisis due to a prominent figure who recently "stepped down" multiple times causing major issues for the current government and country due to ignored red flags and clear indicators he wasn't fit for this level of goverment.
And the bookies place in the no.1. position a prominent figure who recently "stepped down" due to a red flag, which was entirely justifiable, have we learnt nothing?
Anyone up there noticing some patterns?

Un fuk in be liev a ble.
 
Last edited:
IMG_1307.jpeg
 
Back
Top