Multi culturism... what's not to like?

Status
Not open for further replies.
I do find them amusing :) Abusive! Chortle. Is that more or less abusive than you calling everyone racist?
Yawn. This must be about the 10th time I've said this to you, please listen. 'Cred' on a forum and from you means jack ****. It really is pointless trying to hit me with a credibility slur. That's the little sad world that you live in, wanting cred from strangers, not mine.
Yawn. This must be about the 10th time I've said this to you, please listen, you're inventing or imagining things with your: "you calling everyone racist" comment.
You're not only making fallacious accusations, you're also continuing with your abusive insults.
At least you are refraining from four-letter expletives now. So there is some improvement, but room for far more yet.

You've still to learn the art of logical discussion.
 
Sponsored Links
You've still to learn the art of logical discussion.

McEnroecannotbe%20serious1.jpg
 
I do find them amusing :) Abusive! Chortle. Is that more or less abusive than you calling everyone racist?
Yawn. This must be about the 10th time I've said this to you, please listen. 'Cred' on a forum and from you means jack ****. It really is pointless trying to hit me with a credibility slur. That's the little sad world that you live in, wanting cred from strangers, not mine.
Yawn. This must be about the 10th time I've said this to you, please listen, you're inventing or imagining things with your: "you calling everyone racist" comment.
You're not only making fallacious accusations, you're also continuing with your abusive insults.
At least you are refraining from four-letter expletives now. So there is some improvement, but room for far more yet.

You've still to learn the art of logical discussion.
Please go read what your fallacious accusations today. You invented that I agreed with the sentiment over your post with Gerry. Not true. Now you're inventing that I now agree with Gerry. Not true. Urm... You could actually practice what you preach and not invent stuff yourself?
 
Sponsored Links
I do find them amusing :) Abusive! Chortle. Is that more or less abusive than you calling everyone racist?
Yawn. This must be about the 10th time I've said this to you, please listen. 'Cred' on a forum and from you means jack ****. It really is pointless trying to hit me with a credibility slur. That's the little sad world that you live in, wanting cred from strangers, not mine.
Yawn. This must be about the 10th time I've said this to you, please listen, you're inventing or imagining things with your: "you calling everyone racist" comment.
You're not only making fallacious accusations, you're also continuing with your abusive insults.
At least you are refraining from four-letter expletives now. So there is some improvement, but room for far more yet.

You've still to learn the art of logical discussion.
Please go read what your fallacious accusations today. You invented that I agreed with the sentiment over your post with Gerry. Not true. Now you're inventing that I now agree with Gerry. Not true. Urm... You could actually practice what you preach and not invent stuff yourself?
Yet you saw fit to criticise me for criticising Gerry, yet you didn't see fit to criticise Gerry. In fact you jumped to his defence, even though he was clearly wrong.
Do you think that's logical?
Do you think that's a normal way to conduct a discussion, especially when one of the party are clearly trying to misrepresent the report, and in so doing, being racist?
Yet you saw fit to jump to their defence?
Waddling like a duck again. Is it any surprise that you are mistaken for a duck?
 
I do find them amusing :) Abusive! Chortle. Is that more or less abusive than you calling everyone racist?
Yawn. This must be about the 10th time I've said this to you, please listen. 'Cred' on a forum and from you means jack ****. It really is pointless trying to hit me with a credibility slur. That's the little sad world that you live in, wanting cred from strangers, not mine.
Yawn. This must be about the 10th time I've said this to you, please listen, you're inventing or imagining things with your: "you calling everyone racist" comment.
You're not only making fallacious accusations, you're also continuing with your abusive insults.
At least you are refraining from four-letter expletives now. So there is some improvement, but room for far more yet.

You've still to learn the art of logical discussion.
Please go read what your fallacious accusations today. You invented that I agreed with the sentiment over your post with Gerry. Not true. Now you're inventing that I now agree with Gerry. Not true. Urm... You could actually practice what you preach and not invent stuff yourself?
Yet you saw fit to criticise me for criticising Gerry, yet you didn't see fit to criticise Gerry. In fact you jumped to his defence, even though he was clearly wrong.
Do you think that's logical?
Do you think that's a normal way to conduct a discussion, especially when one of the party are clearly trying to misrepresent the report, and in so doing, being racist?
Yet you saw fit to jump to their defence?
Waddling like a duck again. Is it any surprise that you are mistaken for a duck?
Do your rantings actually have a point or are you just stalking Blightymam? Do you get off harassing ladies, is it a new hobby in between watching internet porn and preaching on a Friday?
 
Yet you saw fit to criticise me for criticising Gerry, yet you didn't see fit to criticise Gerry. In fact you jumped to his defence, even though he was clearly wrong.
Do you think that's logical?
You know I have already told you that I criticised you for the way you talked to Gerry when you hate it done to yourself. Nothing more, nothing less.
I made no comment about his views on the subject discussed and I find it weird that you can't seem to understand the written word and you have to make things up.
 
Yet you saw fit to criticise me for criticising Gerry, yet you didn't see fit to criticise Gerry. In fact you jumped to his defence, even though he was clearly wrong.
Do you think that's logical?
You know I have already told you that I criticised you for the way you talked to Gerry when you hate it done to yourself. Nothing more, nothing less.
I made no comment about his views on the subject discussed and I find it weird that you can't seem to understand the written word and you have to make things up.
He really gets upset when you accuse him of being racist but to me, it is a case of Kettle calling the pot black
 
The men of Surrey simply can't be trusted to behave like civilised human beings.

As you well know that would apply to a far smaller percentage of the men of Surrey than it would of any islamic country you care to name.
 
The point is that the men of Surrey have shown themselves to be violent criminals, killers and rapists.

Surely you agree that they should all be sent back to Surrey and imprisoned behind a wall?

You're not going to tell me that we should only lock up the ones who have already been found guilty.
 
Let's just cut to the chase and ask the resident female of our species whether or not she feels more or less safe at the prospect of more and more men with an Islamic upbringing in this country, considering their well known views on women as chattels.
And considering what's already happened in Germany.
Blightymam, or any other ladies, your views please.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Sponsored Links
Back
Top