I said this before...
"The judge told the court: "Sometimes death may be caused by an act of gross carelessness, sometimes it is very close to a case of murder in its seriousness. That is so, here."
He said the defendants' denials they did not know they were dragging anything behind the car were "clearly false" and he rejected the idea they had shown remorse."
So is it that the judge believed they knew they were dragging 'something', but seems to have come to the conclusion they didn't know what?