Who will?
Peoples' Vote.
- Thread starter Doppleganger
- Start date
- Status
Sponsored Links
- Joined
- 28 Dec 2010
- Messages
- 474
- Reaction score
- 129
- Country
- Joined
- 28 Dec 2010
- Messages
- 474
- Reaction score
- 129
- Country
This eu is the most corrupt dictatorship on the planet, the sooner it's blown away, the better!!
I guess you can't answer then? You sound like a loon.
Sponsored Links
- Joined
- 28 Dec 2010
- Messages
- 474
- Reaction score
- 129
- Country
How did that bunch of eu crooks not get their accounts audited for more than 20 years then Knowall.?? You sound like a goon!!
- Joined
- 28 Dec 2010
- Messages
- 474
- Reaction score
- 129
- Country
Usual cr@p from white feather waving D.
I need you to answer this please....?
- Joined
- 28 Dec 2010
- Messages
- 474
- Reaction score
- 129
- Country
I need you to answer this Nosie!!
- Joined
- 28 Dec 2010
- Messages
- 474
- Reaction score
- 129
- Country
Last edited:
How will the EU fiddle the numbers? I assume you mean the vote count?
Please explain how the EU would do this and why they did not bother the first time around.
- Joined
- 23 Nov 2018
- Messages
- 442
- Reaction score
- 15
- Country
I suspect this particular avenue of criticism of EU is another red herring.
The UK government didn't have published, audited accounts for hundreds of years, and only published a set of audited accounts for the first time, 8 years ago:
"The Treasury... The first set of accounts to be published will be for the year ended 31 March 2010.
The accounts are independently audited by the Comptroller and Auditor General[2] and get scrutinized by the Public Accounts Committee each year."
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Whole_of_Government_Accounts
The UK government is the only government to publish such accounts:
" It is the only set of audited, consolidated accounts in the world that includes the financial performance and position of both central and local government. " https://www.nao.org.uk/press-release/whole-of-government-accounts-2016-17/
Even they are suspect to not disclosing the accurate picture and to fail to disclose some information:
"Despite recent improvements, the Whole of Government Accounts (WGA) continues to lack specific detail in key areas that would enable a fuller analysis of the public finances. There remains limited information in the WGA..." https://www.nao.org.uk/press-release/whole-of-government-accounts-2016-17/
There may be ulterior motives for this non-disclosure:
" As the UK exits from the European Union and the process of managing the government’s deficit progresses, these disclosures and the underlying data will be increasingly relevant and useful; ...." https://www.nao.org.uk/press-release/whole-of-government-accounts-2016-17/
Last edited:
- Joined
- 23 Nov 2018
- Messages
- 442
- Reaction score
- 15
- Country
I think I am beginning to realise my expectations were too high.
I expected a sensible debate when I started this thread.
For sure we were always going to get the nonentities with their one line frivolous and irrelevant comments, but the amount, frivolousness and irrelevance surprises me.
Unsurprisingly, the nonentities always tend to be Brexiteers. Or maybe, as John suggests, they are on their second bottle and their inhibitions are reduced to such a level that they resort to such frivolous and irrelevant comments.
I expected a sensible debate when I started this thread.
For sure we were always going to get the nonentities with their one line frivolous and irrelevant comments, but the amount, frivolousness and irrelevance surprises me.
Unsurprisingly, the nonentities always tend to be Brexiteers. Or maybe, as John suggests, they are on their second bottle and their inhibitions are reduced to such a level that they resort to such frivolous and irrelevant comments.
D
durhamplumber
What you mean is,like all remoaners you spitting your dummy out because not everyone agrees with you
- Status
Sponsored Links
Similar threads
