Remedial works quote following EICR inspection

[scousespark]

I asked to see the details as the summary doesn't have enough info to answer the original question. Some of the codes are vague (eg. Poor condition for accessories as C2).

I would point out that missing blanks is a C1.

As for the quote, I would question why it lists work to fix C3 items. From the items listed, there is little to indicate a second inspection is required.

 

[securespark]

Unless the customer wants a fresh EICR with nothing major on it.

 

[ericmark]

Personally I would ask for a second quote with a CU change included instead of repairing the existing one. We can always find fault with an EICR it is one persons opinion, I personally feel the requirement for the report to be given to tenants has messed it all up, as they will see not only real faults, but any suggestion, and possible faults which could happen at a latter date, which the land lord needs to know about, but does not affect a tenant.

 

[scousespark]

Unless the customer wants a fresh EICR with nothing major on it.

From what is posted, I'd say there is little being changed which would fundamentally affect the report.

 

[securespark]

I can only speak from experience that some of my customers want a rewritten report once all the major stuff has been addressed.

 

[JohnW2]

I can only speak from experience that some of my customers want a rewritten report once all the major stuff has been addressed.

I can understand that but I presume that scousespark's point was that even if all the work per quote were done, the EICR (if done the same way) would still be far from 'clean', still including a good C2s.

Kind Regards, John